Purchase of a car (public survey)

This tender for electric vehicles is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects. The short submission deadline and the absence of explicit sustainability considerations are notable concerns.

The tender follows an open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline is very short. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is clear.

The title and basic description are clear. The CPV code is specified. However, crucial details regarding evaluation criteria are missing, impacting the clarity of how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of several attached documents is not extracted, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. E-procurement is indicated. However, the lack of disclosed value and missing evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, although no specific company tailoring is evident.

E-procurement is mentioned, which is positive. However, the contract duration is very short (3 months), and financing information is not provided. The lack of extracted content from key documents also reduces practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender is active, and no suspensions or disputes are noted. Dates are logically presented.

The tender focuses on electric vehicles, which is a positive step towards green procurement. However, there are no explicit mentions of other social aspects, innovation, or EU funding.