Tenders

Medals (open tender)

Open
Deadline
2 days left
March 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6713377
Value
€14,876
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 05, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€14,876
Duration
12 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€267,463
Avg. Bids
5.0
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
97%
739 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Medals for blood donors
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygų 1 priedas. Pasiūlymo formaDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 1 priedas. Pasiūlymo forma.doc...

This document is a tender offer form for the public procurement of medals for blood donors, requiring information about the supplier, subcontractors, pricing, and confirmation of compliance with tender conditions.

Pirkimo sąlygų 3 priedas. Sutarties projektasDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 3 priedas. Sutarties projektas...

This document contains the draft purchase-sale agreement for the procurement of medals for blood donors, detailing the object of the contract, price, and payment procedures.

NoticePDF
Notice_6713377.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of medals for blood donors by the National Blood Centre in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 14,876 Euros.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6713377_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender for medals for blood donors, requiring a complete tender file to be submitted.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for medals is generally well-structured with clear basic information and attached documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code, disclosing the estimated value, and having a clear procedure type. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of disputes and the active status are positive. However, the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond standard procedures and the missing reveal date are minor drawbacks.

Clarity80/100

The title, description, and purpose of the procurement are clear. Key documents like the bid form, contract draft, and terms are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities leaves room for interpretation and reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific exclusion grounds provided
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, estimated value, and contract duration. Several essential documents are attached. However, the significant omission of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities means crucial aspects of the tender are not fully specified, impacting completeness.

Missing specific requirements for exclusion grounds
Missing specific eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator of fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments, and the absence of detailed requirements might disadvantage some bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement,' suggesting an electronic submission process. The contract duration is specified. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and financing information, along with the potential for a short submission deadline, reduces practicality.

No e-submission details provided (despite 'E-Procurement' characteristic)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active with no disputes. The dates provided are logical. The CPV code is present. The consistency of the provided information is high.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or characteristics, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Essential documents provided (bid form, contract draft)
CPV code and estimated value disclosed
E-Procurement characteristic noted

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Potential for a short submission deadline
Missing contract start date and financing information

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance fairness and transparency.
2. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements to ensure completeness and clarity.
3. Clarify the contract start date and financing details to improve practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline