Tenders

Outdoor fitness equipment

Open
Deadline
9 days left
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6712405
Value
€68,017
Location
Marijampole County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€68,017
Duration
4 months
Location
Marijampole County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€102,853
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
67 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Marijampolė Municipality Administration is conducting an open (simplified) tender for outdoor fitness equipment
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Pirkimo_salygos.docx

This document contains the terms and conditions for an open simplified tender by the Marijampolė Municipality Administration to procure outdoor fitness equipment.

Sutarties projektasDOC
Sutarties projektas - lauko treniruokliai.doc...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy.

Techninė specifikacijaDOC
Techninė specifikacija.docx

This document contains technical specifications for outdoor fitness equipment, requiring all equipment to be from a single manufacturer, suitable for year-round outdoor use, resistant to environmental factors and vandalism, and compliant with EN 16630 or equivalent standards.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6712405.pdf

This document contains a tender notice from the Marijampolė Municipality Administration for the procurement of outdoor fitness equipment.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted XML file, likely an ESPD request, within a README file.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6712405_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for an open simplified procurement process.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 218.1 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to a tender for outdoor exercise equipment in Marijampolė.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for outdoor fitness equipment is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed sustainability considerations. The e-procurement aspect is present, but the overall practicality could be improved with clearer submission guidance.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a local authority. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could impact the legal defensibility of the award process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The tender title, reference, organization, and basic description are clear. Key documents like the contract notice, terms and conditions, contract draft, and technical specifications are provided. However, the absence of explicit eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the main tender description leads to some ambiguity.

No specific eligibility requirements provided
No specific technical capability requirements provided
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and tender validity. Eight documents are attached, including essential ones like the contract notice, terms and conditions, contract draft, and technical specifications. However, the lack of detailed requirements in the main description and the missing reveal date for the opening are noted.

Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement is a positive indicator. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which is a concern for transparency and fairness. Requirements are generally objective, with a notable technical specification for equipment quality.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and while financing information is implied by the estimated value, it's not detailed. The duration of the contract is specified. The lack of clear submission requirements in the main description might hinder practical submission.

No e-submission (implied by lack of specific instructions)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active, and no disputes or suspensions are indicated. Dates are logically presented, with the opening date following the submission deadline. The tender validity period is also consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. The technical specification focuses on durability and compliance with standards, which indirectly supports sustainability through longevity, but explicit criteria are absent.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and open procedure type
Comprehensive set of essential tender documents provided
E-procurement utilized
Estimated value and contract duration clearly stated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Absence of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
3. Incorporate explicit sustainability goals (e.g., green procurement, social aspects).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline