Supply of Alcohol and Beverages for Exeter Corn Exchange

This tender for beverage supply demonstrates good foundational information but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds, significantly impacting fairness and legal compliance. Data consistency issues and a lack of e-submission further detract from its overall quality.

While the procedure type and CPV codes are correctly assigned, and the submission period appears reasonable, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds. The missing reveal date also impacts transparency.

The description of the required services and the AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the absence of evaluation criteria creates significant ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed, hindering overall clarity for potential suppliers.

Basic tender information, financial details, and timelines are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria. The 'Required: No' status for all listed documents is also ambiguous, potentially indicating a lack of clarity on what constitutes the full tender package.

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis of award. The absence of electronic submission also limits equal access for potential suppliers.

Key practical details such as contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback, potentially complicating the bidding process for suppliers.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a significant inconsistency regarding the contract duration, with the main information stating 36 months while a document summary mentions 'up to 5 years.' Minor fields like 'Liable Person' are also empty.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it indicated as EU funded. This suggests a low emphasis on sustainability considerations.