Tenders

Folding beds

Open
Deadline
9 days left
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6705139
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to purchase 1,314 folding beds (including delivery), intended for
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo BSDOC
AK (supaprastintas) BS_sulankstomos lovos.doc...

This document outlines the terms and conditions for a public procurement process to acquire 1,314 folding beds, including delivery, with detailed sections on definitions, general provisions, procurement object, communication, bid preparation, evaluation, and contract award.

Pirkimo SSDOC
AK (supaprastintas) SS_sulankstomos lovos.doc...

This document contains the special conditions for a simplified public procurement tender for the purchase of 1,314 folding beds, including delivery, intended for temporary accommodation of evacuated residents.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 83.9 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6705139.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of 1,314 folding beds, including delivery, for the temporary accommodation of evacuated residents.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML format and an ESPD request in PDF format, likely related to a tender for folding beds.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6705139_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, requiring a file to be uploaded.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.6 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to the procurement of 1,314 folding beds.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for folding beds is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects. The estimated value is not disclosed, impacting full transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes a CPV code. While deadlines are present, the opening date is immediately after the submission deadline, which is standard. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant legal requirement for transparency and fairness in public procurement.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, specifying the item (folding beds) and quantity (1,314 units) with delivery included. Key documents like the contract notice and general terms are available. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a description. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a key piece of information for potential bidders to assess the scale and importance of the tender. The ESPD request file appears to have issues (corrupted).

Estimated value not disclosed
Corrupted ESPD request file
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is open. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce transparency and could potentially disadvantage bidders who cannot gauge the financial scope or understand the assessment basis.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the contract duration of 3 months is very short for a procurement of this nature, potentially limiting the pool of qualified suppliers or leading to higher costs. Financing information is not detailed.

Short contract duration (3 months)
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of goods and quantity
Open procedure (2014/24/ES)
E-procurement utilized
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short contract duration
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline