Tenders

Extension of the public purpose building complex building at Bažnyčių g. 4, Klaipėda

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6704569
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
7 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Extension of the public purpose building complex building, located at Bažnyčių g. 4, Klaipėda,
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

3 priedas Pasiūlymo formaDOC
3_priedas_-_Pasiulymo_forma.docx

This document contains the offer form for a public procurement tender regarding renovation and repair works for an extension of a public building in Klaipėda.

4 priedas Rangos_sutartis_(projektas).docxDOC
4 priedas Rangos_sutartis_(projektas).docx -- 62.5 KB

No content extracted

Apklausos specialiosios sąlygosDOC
Specialiosios_skelbiamos_apklausos_salygos.do...

This document contains special conditions for a public procurement tender for the restoration and repair works of an extension to a public building in Klaipėda, Lithuania, specifying requirements for bidders and their proposals.

Sutarties priedas Nr. 2.docxDOC
Sutarties priedas Nr. 2.docx -- 17.0 KB

No content extracted

9 priedas LeidimasPDF
9_priedas_-_Leidimas.pdf

No content extracted

Leidimas.pdfPDF
Leidimas.pdf -- 265.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6704569.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for renovation and repair works on a public building extension in Klaipėda, Lithuania.

Pirkimo dokumentų metaduomenysPDF
Pirkimo_dokumentu_metaduomenys.pdf

This document contains metadata for tender number 56902 concerning the renovation and repair works of an extension to a public building at Bažnyčių g. 4, Klaipėda.

Apklausos bendrosios sąlygosPDF
Skelbiamos_apklausos_bendrosios_salygos_VPT24...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a public procurement tender, outlining the procedures, requirements, and evaluation criteria for bidders.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6704569_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender procedure for a building extension in Klaipėda, requiring a complete tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for public building renovation is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and active status. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor procedural ambiguities.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and multiple relevant documents are provided. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the contract duration and a clear description of the works. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and specific submission requirements are not detailed within the provided text.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No specific requirements listed for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and discloses the contract duration, promoting transparency. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of disclosed financing information and a clear contract start date, alongside the potentially short submission deadline, reduces overall practicality.

Submission Deadline: 2026-03-06 13:00:00 (potentially short)
Estimated Value: Not disclosed (impacts financing understanding)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and description of works
Multiple relevant documents provided
Utilizes e-procurement
Active status and reference number present

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value to provide better context for bidders.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if deemed too short for comprehensive proposal preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline