Tenders

Facade renovation of the rear barracks building of Kaunas Fortress 4th Fort, Plytinės g. 15, Kaunas

Open
Deadline
9 days left
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6699903
Value
€433,774
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€433,774
Duration
20 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Facade renovation of the rear barracks building of Kaunas Fortress 4th Fort, located at Plytinės g. 15, Kaunas
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for the construction of the rear barracks of the 4th fort of Kaunas Fortress.

Atviro konkurso (supapaprast) specialiosios sąlygos (IV forto tvarkyba)DOC
Atviro konkurso (supapaprast) specialiosios s...

This document contains the special conditions for an open tender regarding the renovation of the facades of the rear barracks building of the 4th Fort of Kaunas Fortress.

NoticePDF
Notice_6699903.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the renovation of facades of the rear barracks of the 4th fort of Kaunas Fortress in Kaunas, Lithuania.

PS 7 priedas Sutarties projektasPDF
PS 7 priedas Sutarties projektas.pdf

This document contains the draft of a construction contract for the renovation of the facades of the barracks building at the 4th fort of Kaunas Fortress.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6699903_1.xml

This document contains the complete tender structure for an open procedure, including a mandatory file submission for the facade renovation of barracks at Kauno tvirtovės 4th fort.

PS 3 priedas EBVPDXML
PS 3 priedas EBVPD.xml

This document contains a request for information regarding participation in criminal organizations as an exclusion criterion for a tender related to the construction of barracks at the 4th fort of Kaunas fortress.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for facade renovation of a historical building in Kaunas is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, and essential documents like the contract notice and special conditions are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Six tender documents are attached, providing a good foundation. However, the lack of explicit details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the AI-extracted section indicates a potential for missing information that might be within the attached documents.

No information available on specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
No information available on specific eligibility requirements.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competition. The deadline is reasonable for the scope.

Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific method for e-submission is not detailed. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is limited to the estimated value. The duration is specified.

No e-submission method specified
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided characteristics.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Proper CPV code and EU procurement type
Six tender documents provided
E-procurement utilized
Value and duration clearly stated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific details on submission requirements
Absence of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)
Unclear e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed instructions for e-submission.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability objectives if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline