Tenders

Construction of pedestrian paths and other engineering structures along the Western Bypass and V. Maciulevičiaus St.

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
ID
Value
€843,753
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€843,753
Duration
21 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The main solutions are pedestrian paths, children's playgrounds and sports fields, and recreation areas with facilities,

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_6693744.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the construction of pedestrian paths, playgrounds, sports fields, and recreational areas in Vilnius, Lithuania, including the preparation of a working project.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6693744_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a complete tender, including a mandatory file submission for an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for pedestrian paths and engineering structures is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documentation. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are reported. The procedure is classified under EU directives.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements indicate that key areas like eligibility and technical capability are addressed. The available documents provide a good overview.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Two relevant documents are attached. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts overall completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. Requirements are general and do not appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the AI-extracted issues mention 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates appear logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are missed opportunities for promoting sustainable development.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description of works
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
Use of e-procurement
Availability of tender documents

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.
3. Incorporate sustainability objectives into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline