Tenders

Televisions (tender announced)

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6690590
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€271,089
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
558 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Televisions: Large television, 1 pc., small television - 6 pcs., Procurement No. 4822
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Large television, 1 pc.
--Small television, 6 pcs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dokumentai. Bendrosios sąlygosDOC
MVP bendrosios_salygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a public procurement process for televisions, outlining definitions, general provisions, the subject of procurement, and communication methods.

Pirkimo dokumentai. Specialiosios sąlygosDOC
MVP Televizoriai. Pirkimo Specialiosios salyg...

This document contains special conditions for a tender to procure televisions, outlining technical specifications, submission requirements, and bidder qualifications.

Pirkimo dokumentai. Priedas 3. Tiekėjo deklaracijaDOC
MVP Televizoriai. Priedas 3. Tiekejo deklarac...

This document is a supplier's declaration confirming the absence of grounds for exclusion from the procurement process, as per specific legal articles and tender conditions.

Pirkimo dokumentai. Priedas 4. Sutarties projektasDOC
MVP Televizoriai. Priedas 4. Sutarties projek...

This document contains the draft contract for the purchase of televisions, outlining general and special terms, definitions, and the subject of the contract.

NoticePDF
Notice_6690590.pdf

This document contains a tender notice from VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė for the procurement of televisions, specifically one large and six small units, with a submission deadline of March 4, 2026.

Pirkimo dokumentai. Priedas 2. Pasiūlymo forma su Technine specifikacijaXLS
MVP Televizoriai. Priedas 2. Pasiulymo_forma....

This document contains the offer form and technical specifications for the procurement of televisions, including one large and six small units.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6690590_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender procedure for purchasing televisions, requiring a complete tender file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for televisions is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. The legal form of the organization is specified.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required items (large and small televisions) is clear. The presence of a technical specification within the offer form document enhances clarity. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the CPV code and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the submission deadline is very short, potentially impacting the completeness of bidder preparation.

Estimated value not disclosed
Short submission deadline
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair with full document access and objective technical requirements. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the short submission deadline and the lack of explicit information regarding contract start date and financing details reduce practicality.

Short submission deadline
Missing contract start date information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender is active and has a defined duration.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code
E-Procurement enabled
Comprehensive set of attached documents
Well-defined technical requirements

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Very short submission deadline
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Extend the submission deadline to allow for adequate bidder preparation.
3. Specify clear evaluation criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline