Tenders

Project proposals for the building of the Public Institution Klaipėda District Municipality Health Center (Tilto g.2, Gargždai)

Open
Deadline
27 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6690242
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
40 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Project proposals for the building of the Public Institution Klaipėda District Municipality Health Center (Tilto g.2, Gargždai)
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a public procurement process for the design proposals of the Klaipėda District Municipality Health Center building.

NoticePDF
Notice_6690242.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for engineering design services for the Klaipėda District Municipality Health Center building in Gargždai, Lithuania.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for engineering design services is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure compliant with EU directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a standard CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a public authority. No disputes are reported. The main weakness is the missing reveal date for submissions.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the subject of the procurement. Key documents like general and special conditions, and technical specifications are available. However, specific evaluation criteria are not detailed, which could be clearer.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and organization details. Eight tender documents are provided, offering substantial information. The primary missing element is the estimated value of the contract.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender uses an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. Requirements are listed as mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial, which are standard. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria prevents a full assessment of objective criteria, but no overtly tailored requirements are apparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the prompt mentions 'No e-submission' as an issue, which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. Assuming e-submission is intended, the main practical concern is the lack of financing information and the contract start date.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Standard open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided
E-Procurement enabled

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Provide specific evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline