Tenders

Canadian goldenrod eradication services (tender announced)

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6684848
Value
€45,827
Location
Siauliai County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€45,827
Duration
12 months
Location
Siauliai County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€116,684
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
2,869 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Canadian goldenrod eradication services (tender announced)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

0 Pirkimo salygos.docxDOC
0 Pirkimo salygos.docx -- 119.3 KB

No content extracted

1 priedas techninė specifikacija.docxDOC
1 priedas techninė specifikacija.docx -- 2.2 MB

No content extracted

2 priedas pasiūlymo forma.docxDOC
2 priedas pasiūlymo forma.docx -- 101.7 KB

No content extracted

3.1. sutarties priedas įkainiai.docxDOC
3.1. sutarties priedas įkainiai.docx -- 14.1 KB

No content extracted

3.2. sutarties priedas baudų aktas.docxDOC
3.2. sutarties priedas baudų aktas.docx -- 13.0 KB

No content extracted

3 priedas viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas.docxDOC
3 priedas viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas... -- 222.3 KB

No content extracted

4 priedas kvalifikacijos reikalavimai tiekėjui.docxDOC
4 priedas kvalifikacijos reikalavimai tiekėju... -- 19.5 KB

No content extracted

5 priedas Informavimas dėl duomenų apsaugos.docxDOC
5 priedas Informavimas dėl duomenų apsaugos.d... -- 16.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6684848.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for invasive weed removal services, specifically Canadian goldenrod, in the Šiauliai region of Lithuania, with an estimated value of €45,827.27.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6684848_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender for the eradication of Canadian goldenrod, requiring bidders to submit a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for invasive weed removal services in Šiauliai is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a public procurement procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are noted. The procedure is open, suggesting a fair process.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specified. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed, impacting overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is largely empty, and while 10 documents are listed, their content summaries are often missing or indicate no content extracted, raising questions about the completeness of the provided documentation.

AI-extracted requirements section is empty
Content summaries missing for several documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with a disclosed value, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair playing field.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', but the specific e-submission method is not detailed. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and while financing is implied by the EU funding, specific details are absent. The short submission deadline also affects practicality.

No explicit e-submission method detailed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the assessment of sustainability efforts.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
CPV code provided
Open procedure and e-procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed e-submission process
Potentially short submission deadline
Incomplete content summaries for tender documents

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide detailed instructions for the e-submission process.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline