Construction works of a new anti-radiation civil protection protective structure for Sumy preschool education

This tender for construction work is generally well-structured with clear basic information and EU funding noted. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria impacts completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural gap.

The title and description are clear, indicating the nature of the construction work. The presence of three attached documents, including a contract notice and purchase documents, suggests a structured approach to providing information. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria leaves a gap in clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The lack of specific exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the AI-extracted section suggests these are detailed within the attached 'Pirkimo dokumentai'.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the undisclosed estimated value makes it difficult for bidders to gauge the scale and potential profitability, which could be seen as a fairness concern. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also hinders transparency.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission is possible. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The submission deadline is relatively short given the complexity of construction tenders, which could be a practical challenge.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code and NUTS code are present, contributing to data consistency.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.