Tenders

2026­VKJ­15­Power plant technological filters

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6669553
Value
€450,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€450,000
Duration
38 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€207,877
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
487 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchased power plant technological filters
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

1. Bendrosios pirkimo s╨lygos (BPS).pdfPDF
1. Bendrosios pirkimo s╨lygos (BPS).pdf -- 368.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6669553.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of power plant technological filters by UAB Ignitis grupės paslaugų centras in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 450,000 Euros.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for power plant technological filters is generally well-structured with good documentation, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and a clear reveal date for the opening. The e-procurement aspect is positive, though some practical submission details could be clearer.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code, estimated value, and a clear procedure type. The deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for the opening is a minor procedural gap.

Missing reveal date for opening
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, description, and lists mandatory requirements. The availability of numerous documents, including technical specifications and contract terms, contributes to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant aspect of the decision-making process unclear.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. A substantial number of documents are provided, covering various aspects of the procurement. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and a reveal date for the opening detracts from overall completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with full document access and the value disclosed. The use of e-procurement and objective criteria (implied by technical and financial requirements) promotes fairness. There are no obvious signs of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as e-procurement, which is a positive for practicality. However, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not provided. Financing information is also absent.

No explicit e-submission mechanism detailed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is active, aligning with the provided timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the score in this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation provided
Clear CPV code and estimated value
Designated as e-procurement
No apparent tailored requirements

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing reveal date for opening
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Provide a reveal date for the tender opening.
3. Incorporate explicit sustainability or innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline