Tenders

Optical dilatometer (simplified open tender)

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6663790
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€136,921
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,192 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority is carrying out the procurement of an optical dilatometer. Detailed requirements for the subject of procurement are specified.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Atviro konkurso bendrosios_SAK.docxDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios_SAK.docx -- 111.8 KB

No content extracted

Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos_SAK.docxDOC
Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos_SAK.doc... -- 48.0 KB

No content extracted

SPS 1 priedas_Terminai.docxDOC
SPS 1 priedas_Terminai.docx -- 22.2 KB

No content extracted

SPS 2 priedas_Techninė specifikacija_Dilatometras.docxDOC
SPS 2 priedas_Techninė specifikacija_Dilatome... -- 50.6 KB

No content extracted

SPS 3 priedas_Tiekėjų pašalinimo pagrindai_SAK.docxDOC
SPS 3 priedas_Tiekėjų pašalinimo pagrindai_SA... -- 34.0 KB

No content extracted

SPS 5 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma.docxDOC
SPS 5 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma.docx -- 30.4 KB

No content extracted

SPS 6 priedas_Sutarties projektas_BD.docxDOC
SPS 6 priedas_Sutarties projektas_BD.docx -- 62.9 KB

No content extracted

SPS 6 priedas_Sutarties projektas_SD.docxDOC
SPS 6 priedas_Sutarties projektas_SD.docx -- 49.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6663790.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of an optical dilatometer by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, with detailed technical specifications provided in an appendix.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6663790_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a complete tender for an optical dilatometer, specifying it as a mandatory file to be submitted by the bidder.

SPS 4 priedas_EBVPD.zipZIP
SPS 4 priedas_EBVPD.zip -- 84.0 KB

This document contains general and special conditions for an open tender procedure for the procurement of an optical dilatometer, including definitions and procurement details.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an optical dilatometer is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial disclosure. It is EU-funded and uses e-procurement, but has limited sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context of an open tender. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could impact legal compliance if not detailed within the attached documents.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title and basic information are clear. The description indicates detailed requirements are in attached documents. The availability of 11 documents suggests comprehensive information, though content summaries are missing for many. The main clarity issue is the absence of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice.

Missing evaluation criteria in main notice
Lack of content summaries for most attached documents
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While 11 documents are attached, the lack of content summaries for most makes it difficult to assess their completeness without downloading and reviewing each one.

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of content summaries for most attached documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. E-procurement is utilized. The value is not disclosed, which slightly reduces transparency. Requirements are not explicitly tailored to specific companies, and the procedure appears objective. Full access to documents is implied by their availability.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive for practicality. However, the submission deadline is relatively short (10 days from publication), and the contract start date is not specified. Financing information is not detailed. The duration is specified.

Short submission deadline
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline. No suspensions or disputes are indicated. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This suggests a moderate focus on sustainability.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
EU Funded and E-Procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of attached documents (11 total)
Appropriate CPV code and NUTS code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of content summaries for most attached documents

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria within the tender notice or a prominent document.
3. Provide content summaries for all attached documents to improve bidder understanding.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline