Preparation of Technical Work Projects for the Repair of Melioration Structures in Klaipėda District Municipality

This tender for engineering design services for melioration structures in Klaipėda district is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard e-procurement process. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and utilizes a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are indicated, the absence of a reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural gap. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope.

The title and description clearly indicate the subject of the procurement. Technical specifications are provided in two parts, suggesting a structured approach. General and special conditions are also available. However, specific evaluation criteria are not detailed, which could impact clarity for bidders.

Most essential information is present, including the organization, reference number, contract duration, and CPV code. Ten tender documents are available, covering technical specifications, general and special conditions, and ESPD requests. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The division into parts suggests potential for broader participation. All documents appear to be accessible. The lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no overt signs of company-specific tailoring.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive for submission practicality. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this, suggesting a potential discrepancy or a misunderstanding of the system. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. Dates are logically ordered. The CPV code is present and relevant.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score. The focus is primarily on technical repair.