Tenders

Water supply line DN700 Chemijos g.21 - Kovo 11-osios g./Dujotiekio g. design services and

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6628239
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Water supply line DN700 Chemijos g.21 - Kovo 11-osios g./Dujotiekio g. design services and
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

16 documents available with AI summaries

Doc-Pirkimo dokumentai.docxDOC
Doc-Pirkimo dokumentai.docx -- 72.8 KB

No content extracted

Priedas Nr 1 Techninė specifikacija.docxDOC
Priedas Nr 1 Techninė specifikacija.docx -- 54.4 KB

No content extracted

Priedas Nr 2 Tiekėjų pašalinimo pagrindai.docxDOC
Priedas Nr 2 Tiekėjų pašalinimo pagrindai.doc... -- 53.0 KB

No content extracted

Priedas Nr 3 ir Nr 4 Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos reikalavimai ir EBVPD.docxDOC
Priedas Nr 3 ir Nr 4 Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos r... -- 34.2 KB

No content extracted

Priedas Nr 5 Pasiūlymo forma.docxDOC
Priedas Nr 5 Pasiūlymo forma.docx -- 27.8 KB

No content extracted

Priedas Nr 6 Pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijai ir sąlygosDOC
Priedas Nr 6 Pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijai i...

This document outlines the criteria and conditions for evaluating tender proposals, focusing on the price-quality ratio and a formula for calculating economic utility.

Priedas Nr 7 Sutarties projektas.docxDOC
Priedas Nr 7 Sutarties projektas.docx -- 58.5 KB

No content extracted

Priedas prie Sutarties_Nr 5_Subrangovų sąrašo forma.docxDOC
Priedas prie Sutarties_Nr 5_Subrangovų sąrašo... -- 24.8 KB

No content extracted

Priedas prie Sutarties_Nr 6_Specialistų sąrašas.docxDOC
Priedas prie Sutarties_Nr 6_Specialistų sąraš... -- 17.5 KB

No content extracted

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 92.6 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6628239.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the design services and new construction works for a DN700 water pipeline in Kaunas, Lithuania, with an amendment regarding the deadline for submitting clarifications.

Priedėlis Nr. 2 Perklojamo tinklo schema.pdfPDF
Priedėlis Nr. 2 Perklojamo tinklo schema.pdf -- 1.5 MB

No content extracted

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a README file with a snippet of corrupted data, likely related to a tender for design services for water supply lines.

Priedas prie Sutarties_Nr_4 Pazymos apie atliktu darbu verte forma.xlsxXLS
Priedas prie Sutarties_Nr_4 Pazymos apie atli... -- 16.2 KB

No content extracted

Priedėlis Nr. 1.Darbų žiniaraštis.xlsxXLS
Priedėlis Nr. 1.Darbų žiniaraštis.xlsx -- 21.4 KB

No content extracted

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 139.7 KB

Summary generation failed

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for water pipeline design services is generally well-structured, with most required documents available. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (Open) is correctly identified.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the presence of technical specifications and contract drafts indicates documented requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes the selection process less transparent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding financing are missing, which affects the completeness of the financial aspects.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing financing info
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders and utilizes e-procurement, promoting fairness. All documents appear to be accessible. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of disclosed financing information and the absence of a clear contract start date reduce its practicality for potential bidders in their planning.

Value not disclosed
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active and has no noted suspensions or disputes, ensuring logical data flow.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
CPV code and NUTS code specified
Multiple relevant documents attached
Utilizes e-procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations
Missing financing information

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline