Tenders

ERGONOMIC FACTORS AND PHYSICAL MEASUREMENT RESEARCH (low-value procurement)

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6612182
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€771,462
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
989 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

ERGONOMIC FACTORS AND PHYSICAL MEASUREMENT RESEARCH (PU-50/2026)
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dok.DOC
deklaracija nuo 2025-02-01.docx

This document contains a supplier's declaration regarding grounds for exclusion, as per Article 46, Paragraph 21 of the Public Procurement Law.

Pirkimo dok.DOC
pirkimo dok..docx

This document contains the procurement documents for a low-value tender by VšĮ Jonavos ligoninė for ergonomic factors and physical measurement research.

SutartisDOC
Sutartis.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a service purchase and sale agreement, defining key terms and outlining the hierarchy of contractual documents.

TIEKĖJO DEKLARACIJADOC
Tiekėjo deklaracija.docx

This document is a supplier's declaration confirming the absence of conditions set out in Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576, requiring up-to-date data and a power of attorney if signed by an authorized employee.

NoticePDF
Notice_6612182.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for ergonomic factors and physical measurement research services in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 0 Euros and a submission deadline of March 3, 2026.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6612182_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for the ERGONOMINIŲ VEIKSNIŲ IR FIZIKINIŲ MATAVIMŲ TYRIMAI tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for ergonomic and physical measurement research is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process for a low-value procurement. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria and financing information slightly impacts its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement principles for a low-value purchase. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure is open. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while short, is within the realm of possibility for low-value tenders, though it could be tighter.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the provided documents offer a good overview of the procurement. The requirements are documented within the attached 'Pirkimo dok.' (procurement documents). However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the tender notice itself could lead to some ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for a tender. While documents are attached, the absence of financing details and explicit evaluation criteria reduces overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Financing information not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and all documents appear to be accessible, promoting fairness. The criteria for exclusion are mentioned, and the process is e-procurement. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but it doesn't appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the estimated value is missing, which hinders financial planning for potential bidders. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality.

Contract start date not specified
Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The absence of a contract start date is a minor inconsistency.

Contract start date not specified
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear documentation and accessible tender documents
Open procedure and e-procurement utilized
Appropriate CPV code and NUTS code provided
Well-defined exclusion grounds mentioned

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Contract start date not specified
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria in the tender notice.
3. Specify the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline