Tenders

Technical supervision of the first stage works of the object 'Klaipėda Seaport Southern Gate Complex - communication structures (southern, northern breakwaters, piers and quays)'

Open
Deadline
22 days left
March 25, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6602366
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 18, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 25, 2026

Tender Opening

March 25, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Lithuania
Type
Other
58
Quality Score/100
Fair
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Technical supervision services for the construction of structures in the construction project 'Construction stage I of communication structures (southern, northern breakwaters, piers and quays) at Kairių g. 17, Klaipėda'

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-25 09:00:00.
--No specific submission forms or templates were provided in the available tender information.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were provided in the available tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements were provided in the available tender information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements were provided in the available tender information.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements were provided in the available tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dokumentai DVP-53PDF
Pirkimo dokumentai DVP-53.pdf

This document contains the procurement documents for an open (international) tender for technical supervision services for the first stage of construction of communication infrastructure (dams, piers, and quays) at Kairių street 17, Klaipėda.

Pirkimo dokumentu 10 priedas - sutarties projektasPDF
Pirkimo dokumentu 10 priedas - sutarties proj...

This document contains a draft service purchase-sale agreement for technical supervision services for the construction of communication structures at Kairių g. 17, Klaipėda, outlining the contract object, duration, and pricing terms.

Pirkimo dokumentu 10 priedas - sutarties projekto priedasPDF
Pirkimo dokumentu 10 priedas - Sutarties proj...

This document contains a template for a Service Acceptance Act, to be completed by the supplier, detailing performed services, their value, and payment calculations for a construction technical supervision contract.

Pirkimo dokumentu 10 priedas - Technine specifikacijaPDF
Pirkimo dokumentu 10 priedas - Technine speci...

This document contains the technical specification for general and special technical supervision services for the first construction stage of communication infrastructure buildings (dams, piers, and quays) at Kairių g. 17, Klaipėda, outlining service scope, duration, quality requirements, and legal compliance.

Pirkimo dokumentu 9 priedas - EBVPDPDF
Pirkimo dokumentu 9 priedas - EBVPD.pdf

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form for the tender concerning technical supervision services for the construction of communication infrastructure facilities in Klaipėda, requiring bidders to provide detailed information about their identity, legal representatives, reliance on other entities, and grounds for exclusion.

Pirkimo dokumentu 9 priedas - EBVPDXML
Pirkimo dokumentu 9 priedas - EBVPD.xml

This document contains an ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) request outlining exclusion criteria, specifically regarding participation in a criminal organization, for a tender concerning construction technical supervision services in Klaipėda.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

58
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender for technical supervision services demonstrates good legal compliance and data consistency, with a clear project description and e-procurement. However, it suffers from critical deficiencies in fairness and clarity due to the absence of evaluation criteria and undisclosed estimated value, significantly hindering transparency and competitive bidding.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender adheres to EU directives (2014/25/ES) and uses the ESPD, indicating good procedural compliance. CPV codes are correctly assigned, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor issues include a missing reveal date and undisclosed estimated value, which are disclosure gaps.

Missing reveal date
Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity50/100

The project description is clear and unambiguous. While the AI summary poorly extracted specific requirements, the presence of detailed documents (Technical Specification, ESPD, Contract Draft) suggests these are available. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be judged.

Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Completeness55/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. All documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing evaluation criteria and the undisclosed estimated value, which are crucial for a comprehensive understanding.

Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness35/100

Full document access and e-procurement are positive aspects. Nevertheless, the critical absence of evaluation criteria fundamentally undermines fairness and transparency, making it impossible for bidders to understand the basis of assessment. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency and the ability for fair competition.

Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality60/100

Electronic submission is supported via E-Procurement, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a contract start date and undisclosed estimated value (financing information) reduces the practicality for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation.

Contract start date not known
Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency85/100

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor gaps include the missing NUTS code and undisclosed estimated value. The inconsistencies in the AI summary's extraction of requirements are noted as an AI issue, not a tender data consistency flaw.

NUTS code missing
Estimated value not disclosed
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it falls under EU procurement rules, there are no specific clauses indicating a commitment to sustainability.

No explicit green procurement focus
No explicit social aspects

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Utilizes E-Procurement for accessibility
Good legal compliance with EU directives (2014/25/ES) and use of ESPD
All necessary documents are attached and accessible
No reported disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Critical: Absence of specified evaluation criteria, severely impacting fairness and transparency
Estimated value is not disclosed, limiting bidder's ability to assess opportunity
Missing contract start date and NUTS code
AI summary's poor extraction of requirements could mislead potential bidders
No explicit focus on green, social, or innovation aspects

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value to allow bidders to make informed decisions.
3. Include specific sustainability and social responsibility clauses in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline