Tenders

Public procurement of storage services for state-transferred vehicles in an open area

Open
Deadline
20 days left
March 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6586382
Value
€49,587
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 23, 2026

Tender Opening

March 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€49,587
Duration
12 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€1,219,510
Avg. Bids
3.4
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
173 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of storage services for state-transferred vehicles in an open area
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids must be submitted by 2026-03-23 10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are stated.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The supplier must be legally established and authorized to provide vehicle storage services in Lithuania/EU.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The supplier must have an open area suitable for storing state-transferred vehicles.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are stated.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
Dokumentai.7z

This document contains appendices to special procurement conditions, including a terms list, a supplier declaration form for natural persons confirming non-influence by Russia, and technical specifications for vehicle storage services in Panevėžys and Utena counties.

NoticePDF
Notice_6586382.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice by the Lithuanian State Tax Inspectorate for open-air storage services of state-transferred vehicles in Panevėžys and Utena counties, with a submission deadline of March 23, 2026.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6586382_1.xml

This document contains the XML structure for an open tender procedure, outlining two lots, an evaluation based on the lowest price, and a mandatory file submission for the complete tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for vehicle storage services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and good data consistency, but suffers from a lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria and some practical ambiguities.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears largely compliant with EU and national regulations, featuring a clear procedure type and appropriate CPV codes, with no reported disputes. The submission period of 32 days from today's date is reasonable.

Missing reveal date (for analysis purposes)
Clarity80/100

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, and technical specifications are mentioned as available in the documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main tender overview significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria in the main tender overview
Completeness70/100

While essential information like title, value, duration, and location are provided, the critical omission of explicit evaluation criteria and the empty 'Liable Person' field detract from its completeness.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Fairness85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness through disclosed value, full document access, and seemingly generic requirements. However, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria could impact perceived objectivity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria impacting transparency
Practicality65/100

The tender's practicality is hampered by a contradiction regarding e-submission capabilities (E-Procurement characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' automated check) and the absence of a specified contract start date.

Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality
No explicit contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

The data is largely consistent with logical dates and populated key fields, though there's a notable contradiction regarding e-procurement functionality and a missing 'Liable Person'.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated check
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation aspects, which is common for this type of service but represents a missed opportunity for higher sustainability standards.

No explicit green procurement focus
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description
Value and duration are clearly specified
E-Procurement characteristic indicates modern process
Requirements appear generic and not tailored
All necessary documents are listed and summarized

Concerns

Lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria
Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality
Missing contract start date
No explicit focus on sustainability, social, or innovation aspects
Missing 'Liable Person' and 'reveal date' in the provided data

Recommendations

1. Clearly state all evaluation criteria in the main tender notice to ensure transparency.
2. Clarify the e-submission process to avoid confusion for bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or social clauses where appropriate for future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline