United Kingdom605 days leftOpen

Print Solutions

Tender Overview

LOCATION

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

VALUE

£5,500,000

DEADLINE

September 30, 2027 at 22:59

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

22000000

REFERENCE

022489-2023

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

NWUPC is establishing a DPS for the supply and provision of Print Solutions. NWUPC is managing this process on behalf of members of HEPCW, LUPC, NEUPC, NWUPC & SUPC. The DPS is divided into categories, see II.B below. You can apply for a single Category or for multiple Categories. Deadline for receipt of initial DPS Application submissions- 8th September 2023 13:00 Evaluation of DPS Application submissions and post-submission clarifications (Initial establishment of the DPS)- 8th September 2023 - 22nd September 2023 Deadline for notification of successful admission to DPS (Initial establishment of the DPS)- 22nd September 2023 DPS Open for further competitions- 1st October 2023 DPS re-opens for the duration of the DPS for new requests to participate- 1st October 2023. This DPS will commence on 1/10/23 for 24 months until 30/09/25 with the option to extend for 12 months until 30/09/206 and a further 12 months until 30/09/27.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided text.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Must be a supplier capable of providing 'Print Solutions'.
  • Must be willing to provide services to members of HEPCW, LUPC, NEUPC, NWUPC & SUPC (the university purchasing consortia).
  • Must apply for admission to the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
  • Must select one or multiple categories within the DPS, as the DPS is divided into categories.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Must be able to supply and provide 'Print Solutions' as per the scope of the DPS.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial stability) are mentioned in the provided text.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Must submit a DPS Application.
  • The initial DPS Application must be submitted by 8th September 2023 13:00.
  • Must be prepared for post-submission clarifications during the initial establishment phase (8th September 2023 - 22nd September 2023).
  • New requests to participate in the DPS can be submitted from 1st October 2023 onwards for the duration of the DPS (until 30th September 2027).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF022489-2023_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a contract notice announcing the establishment of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Print Solutions by NWUPC, inviting suppliers to apply for admission to provide services to multiple university purchasing consortia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender describes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for print solutions, which offers flexibility for ongoing market access. However, the critical absence of detailed tender documentation and specific requirements significantly hinders transparency, fairness, and the ability for potential suppliers to submit a comprehensive application.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally recognized procurement procedure. However, the provided text lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility/financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal clarity. The complete absence of actual tender documents is a major legal and procedural deficiency.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly mentioned, relying on general legal frameworks.
Absence of any actual tender documents, which are essential for legal compliance and transparency.
Clarity40/100

The overall structure of the DPS, including its division into categories and the involvement of multiple purchasing consortia, is clearly outlined. The timeline for the DPS establishment and its duration is also well-defined. However, the actual requirements for suppliers are presented at a very high level, lacking the necessary detail for clarity.

Lack of detailed technical, financial, and eligibility requirements, making 'Print Solutions' an overly broad term without further definition.
Absence of specific evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS or for subsequent mini-competitions.
Completeness83/100

The provided information is highly incomplete. While it outlines the DPS structure and timeline, it critically lacks fundamental tender documentation. Key elements such as a detailed scope of services, technical specifications, specific financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

Critical absence of any tender documents ('DOCUMENTS (0 total)').
Missing detailed scope and specifications for 'Print Solutions' and its categories.
Fairness80/100

The DPS mechanism itself is designed to promote fairness by allowing new entrants throughout its duration, which is a strength. However, the significant lack of detailed, objective requirements and evaluation criteria raises serious concerns about potential subjectivity and unequal treatment during the admission process or subsequent mini-competitions. The absence of documents makes a full assessment of fairness impossible.

Lack of specific, objective eligibility, technical, and financial requirements could lead to subjective assessment and potential bias.
Absence of evaluation criteria for DPS admission and subsequent competitions compromises transparency and equal treatment.
Practicality40/100

The DPS structure is practical for managing recurring procurement needs and offers flexibility for both the contracting authority and suppliers. However, the severe lack of detailed information and supporting documents makes it highly impractical for potential suppliers to prepare a robust and competitive application without extensive prior engagement or clarification.

Suppliers cannot adequately prepare an application without detailed requirements, specifications, and evaluation criteria.
The absence of documents makes it difficult for potential bidders to understand the full scope and expectations, leading to increased administrative burden for clarifications.
Data Consistency100/100

There is a notable inconsistency in how the 'Submission Deadline' is presented for a continuously open DPS. While the DPS commenced in 2023 and is open for new requests, the 'Submission Deadline: 2027-09-30' is misleading as an application deadline for new entrants. It likely refers to the overall end date of the DPS, which should be clarified to avoid confusion.

The 'Submission Deadline: 2027-09-30' is inconsistent with the nature of a continuously open DPS for new requests to participate, creating potential confusion for suppliers regarding the application window.
Sustainability0/100

The tender description provides no information regarding environmental, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives into the procurement process.

Complete absence of any sustainability (environmental, social) or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), promoting flexibility and continuous market access for suppliers.
Clearly identifies the multiple university purchasing consortia involved, indicating a collaborative approach.
Estimated value and contract duration are specified, providing financial context.
DPS is divided into categories, allowing for specialized suppliers to participate.
The DPS is explicitly stated to be open for new requests to participate throughout its duration, ensuring ongoing market opportunities.

Concerns

Critical lack of tender documents ('DOCUMENTS (0 total)'), making a comprehensive assessment and supplier participation extremely difficult.
Insufficient detail in eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, hindering fair competition and objective evaluation.
Absence of any stated evaluation criteria for DPS admission or subsequent mini-competitions, raising transparency and fairness concerns.
No integration of sustainability (environmental, social) or innovation criteria, missing an opportunity for responsible procurement.
Data inconsistency regarding the 'Submission Deadline' for a continuously open DPS, which could confuse potential new applicants.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, eligibility criteria, financial requirements, and a clear evaluation methodology for DPS admission and subsequent call-offs.
2. Clearly define the scope of 'Print Solutions' and the specific categories within the DPS to ensure clarity for potential suppliers.
3. Integrate relevant sustainability (environmental, social) and innovation criteria into the DPS requirements and evaluation framework.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
70/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes