13 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
This document defines key public procurement terms and abbreviations, such as Participant, ESPD, Contracting Authority, and Supplier, which are essential for understanding the tender documents.
This form requires bidders to provide their company details, information on entities whose capacities they rely on to meet qualification requirements, and details of any known subcontractors.
This document outlines the special conditions for a green procurement by Mažeikių District Municipality Administration for decorative plants with planting, detailing general requirements, technical specifications, and submission procedures.
This document outlines the general and special conditions of the goods purchase-sale contract for decorative plants, defining key terms and the framework for the agreement.
This document details the technical specifications for decorative plants (seedlings, bulbs, seeds) and their planting services, including specific plant types, colors, preliminary quantities, and quality standards.
This document is a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which bidders must complete to declare they meet the tender's qualification and selection criteria.
Mažeikiai District Municipality Administration seeks bids for decorative plants with planting services, an open tender valued at 41,300 EUR, incorporating green procurement, with a submission deadline of 26 February 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for decorative plants with planting services is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but critically lacks explicit evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity and fairness. Data consistency issues and missing key dates also present moderate concerns.
The tender defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and CPV codes correctly, and the AI-extracted requirements align with legal standards. However, the absence of a tender reveal date and an empty 'Liable Person' field are minor compliance gaps.
The description, technical specifications, and general conditions are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves bidders without knowledge of how their proposals will be judged, which is a major clarity deficiency.
Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are all provided. Essential documents like the offer form and ESPD are included. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of defined evaluation criteria for awarding the contract.
Document access is full, value is disclosed, and e-procurement is enabled. Requirements appear generic. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly. The missing reveal date also impacts the assessment of adequate preparation time.
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and an explicit document URL is not present in the summary, which could slightly hinder practical access.
The tender status is active with no disputes, and e-procurement is confirmed, aligning with direct tender information. Dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the tender reveal date is missing, indicating minor data gaps.
The tender explicitly incorporates 'green procurement' conditions, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific criteria or focus on broader social aspects or innovation, limiting its overall sustainability profile.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Loading competitor predictions...
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required