Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login12 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document defines key terms and abbreviations used in the public procurement process, such as participant, contracting authority, supplier, contract, and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), to ensure a common understanding of all conditions.
This document outlines the special conditions for the capital repair works of the RD0288 Praščiūnai–Dargėnai–Pakiršiniai road, detailing the contracting authority, green procurement requirements, and the scope of works, while referring to technical specifications and the contract draft in other appendices.
This document is a draft contract outlining the special and general conditions for capital repair works on local road RD0288 Praščiūnai–Dargėnai–Pakiršiniai, specifying the client, contractor, and scope of work.
This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, a mandatory self-declaration form for bidders to confirm they meet the qualification and exclusion criteria for the road surfacing works tender.
This is an open tender notice from Radviliškis District Municipality Administration for the capital repair of a 1.203 km section of local road RD0288, with an estimated value of 965,497 Euro, applying green procurement criteria.
This document is a mandatory summary sheet (Appendix 10) for calculating and submitting the total construction work costs, including VAT, broken down by project part, which must be transferred to the offer letter.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for road capital repair demonstrates good adherence to basic procurement principles and includes green procurement criteria. However, significant concerns arise from the absence of specified evaluation criteria and multiple data inconsistencies, which impact clarity, fairness, and overall transparency.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, referencing EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and uses appropriate CPV codes. The inclusion of ESPD indicates compliance with EU standards. However, the missing reveal date prevents verification of the minimum legal submission period, which is a significant compliance oversight. A contradiction regarding 'Tender suspended' vs 'active' status is noted but assumed 'active' is correct.
The tender description is somewhat brief, and while AI-extracted requirements outline categories, they explicitly state that specific details (e.g., for technical, financial capabilities) are not provided in the summary. The most critical issue is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, making it unclear how bids will be assessed.
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are well-defined, and all listed documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria. Furthermore, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that specific details for eligibility, technical, and financial criteria are not fully detailed in the provided summary.
Full document access and value disclosure are positive. E-procurement is stated, promoting equal access. Nevertheless, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis for award. The missing reveal date also means the reasonableness of the submission period cannot be fully assessed, potentially impacting fairness.
The tender explicitly states 'E-Procurement', which is a practical advantage for bidders. However, this is contradicted by an automated check. The absence of a specific contract start date and detailed financing information are minor practical omissions. No document URL is explicitly provided in the summary.
There are significant data inconsistencies. The tender's reveal date is missing. Crucially, the 'Status: active' contradicts the 'Tender suspended' flag from automated checks, and 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' contradicts 'No e-submission'. These contradictions create confusion and undermine trust in the provided data.
The tender explicitly incorporates green procurement criteria, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, which are increasingly important aspects of comprehensive sustainable procurement practices. It is also noted as not being EU funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required