Tenders

Mobile Outpatient Clinic

Open
Deadline
16 days left
March 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6516392
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 20, 2026

Tender Opening

March 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
11 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
59
Quality Score/100
Fair
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€703,059
Avg. Bids
3.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
96%
2,253 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Mobile Outpatient Clinic
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (5)
Compliance (4)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically by the deadline: 2026-03-20 09:30:00.
--The bid must include a comprehensive technical offer detailing the proposed mobile ambulance/outpatient clinic.
--The bid must include a financial offer, clearly stating the price for the goods and any associated services.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS5
--The bidder must not be bankrupt or subject to insolvency or winding-up proceedings.
--The bidder must not have been convicted of offenses related to professional conduct, fraud, corruption, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
--The bidder must have fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of taxes or social security contributions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must be legally constituted and registered in a relevant professional or trade register in their country of establishment.
--The bidder must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
--The bidder must comply with all applicable national and EU laws and regulations relevant to the provision of ambulances/mobile medical units.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must demonstrate experience in supplying similar goods (ambulances or mobile medical units) within a specified period (e.g., last 3-5 years).
--The proposed mobile ambulance/outpatient clinic must meet all technical specifications, performance requirements, and safety standards as defined in the tender documents.
--The bidder must provide evidence of a quality management system (e.g., ISO 9001 certification) for the manufacturing or supply of the goods.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial and economic standing to perform the contract (e.g., minimum annual turnover, financial ratios).
--The bidder must provide evidence of relevant insurance coverage (e.g., professional indemnity, public liability).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

BSDOC
26 02 12_ bendrosios sąlygos_Mobilioji ambula...

This document provides a glossary of key terms and abbreviations used throughout the tender documents, defining concepts such as participant, supplier, contracting authority, and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

SSDOC
26 02 12_specialiosios sąlygos_Mobilioji ambu...

This document provides general information about the tender for a Mobile Ambulatory, outlining the contracting authority, procurement procedures, contact details, and key timelines, while noting green procurement principles and disallowing alternative offers.

SPDOC
26 02 12_Sutarties projektas_Mobili ambulator...

This document is a draft contract outlining the general and special conditions for the purchase and sale of goods, including sections for buyer and supplier details.

TSDOC
Mobili ambulatorija. Techninė specifikacija.d...

This document outlines the technical specifications for a mobile ambulance, requiring electric vehicles, specific medical compartment testing (10G, LST EN 1789), CE-marked medical equipment, and submission of detailed layout drawings.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.2 KB

This document outlines the preliminary qualification criteria and requirements for bidders to participate in the tender for a mobile ambulance/clinic.

NoticePDF
Notice_6516392.pdf

This document is a contract notice from Klaipėdos rajono savivaldybės administracija for an open procurement of a mobile ambulance/clinic, partly funded by EU funds, with selection criteria detailed in the procurement documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

59
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a mobile ambulance demonstrates good technical specification clarity and commitment to green procurement, but is significantly hampered by the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, severely impacting fairness and transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The tender adheres to EU directive 2014/24/ES and includes standard exclusion/eligibility grounds. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a mandatory disclosure requirement for public tenders, especially EU-funded ones.

Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity60/100

The description, AI-extracted requirements, and technical specifications are generally clear and well-documented. A glossary is provided. However, the tender completely lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it unclear how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and most documents are present. Requirements are defined. However, the estimated value and crucial evaluation criteria are missing. The contract start date is also not explicitly stated.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness40/100

Document access is full, e-procurement is enabled, and technical requirements appear generic. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine the fairness and transparency of the procurement process.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, contract duration is clear, and EU funding is confirmed. While a direct document URL isn't provided, e-procurement implies accessibility. The contract start date is not specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency45/100

There are significant inconsistencies. The estimated value is not disclosed, yet it's stated as 'Not over sum limit,' which is a logical contradiction. Furthermore, the tender status is 'active,' but an automated check flags it as 'suspended,' indicating a critical data discrepancy.

Estimated value not disclosed but 'Over Sum Limit: No' stated
Contradiction between 'Status: active' and automated flag 'Tender suspended'
Sustainability70/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'green procurement principles' and requires 'electric vehicles' in its technical specifications, which is a strong positive for environmental sustainability. It is also EU-funded, often implying higher standards. However, it lacks explicit social aspects or an innovation focus.

No explicit social aspects
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical specifications, including electric vehicle requirement
Commitment to green procurement principles
EU funding and adherence to EU procurement directives
Electronic submission (e-procurement) supported
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)

Concerns

Estimated value is not disclosed
Evaluation criteria are completely missing
Inconsistency regarding tender status (active vs. suspended flag)
Logical contradiction: 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' but 'Over Sum Limit: No'
Lack of explicit social aspects or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Immediately disclose the estimated value to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and their weighting.
3. Resolve data inconsistencies, especially regarding the tender's active status.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline