Tenders

Municipal information publication in press and online services

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6501962
Value
€132,231
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€132,231
Duration
16 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Municipal information publication in press and online services. The subject of the procurement is divided into 2
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Must submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-17 13:00:00.
--The bid must address the services for publishing municipal information in print and online.
--The bid must account for the procurement object being divided into 2 parts.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided basic information. Bidders are expected to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be legally capable of providing public relations services.
--Must be able to provide services for publishing municipal information in print and online.
--Must be able to contract with a regional government institution (Klaipėda City Municipality Administration).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate capability in providing public relations services (CPV category).
--Demonstrate capability in publishing information in print media.
--Demonstrate capability in publishing information on the internet.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Must have the financial capacity to undertake a contract with an estimated value of 132,231.4 EUR.
--No specific financial thresholds or guarantees are detailed in the provided basic information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

6 priedas – Paslaugų sutartis (projektas);DOC
6_priedas_-_paslaugu_sutartis_(bendrosios_ir_...

This document is a draft service purchase-sale agreement outlining general terms, key definitions, and procedures related to service provision and payment.

Konkurso sąlygos ( ir 1 priedas; 2 priedas; 3 priedas; 5 priedas);DOC
Konkurso_salygos_(informacija_spaudoje_a._2_d...

This document outlines the general terms, conditions, qualification requirements, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria for the open tender for municipal information publication services in the press and online.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 85.5 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, which bidders must complete to declare their eligibility and compliance with qualification criteria for the tender.

NoticePDF
Notice_6501962.pdf

This document is a contract notice from Klaipėda City Municipality Administration for public relations services, specifically publishing municipal information in print and online, divided into two lots with an estimated value of €132,231.4.

MetaduomenysPDF
Pirkimo_dokumentu_metaduomenys.pdf

This document provides detailed metadata for the tender concerning municipal information dissemination services, outlining internal approval processes and listing key associated documents such as the ESPD, contract template, and tender conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and complete, providing clear requirements and access to essential documents. However, significant data inconsistencies and a lack of sustainability focus are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and uses an appropriate CPV code. The presence of the ESPD document indicates compliance with EU regulations. There are no reported disputes. However, there is a contradiction between the 'Status: active' and the automated check flagging 'Tender suspended'. The reveal date is also missing, making it impossible to assess the full timeline.

Contradiction: 'Status: active' vs. automated flag 'Tender suspended'
Missing reveal date
Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. The 'Konkurso sąlygos' document explicitly states it contains evaluation criteria, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise. Performance conditions are likely detailed in the draft contract.

Contradiction: Automated flag 'No evaluation criteria specified' vs. document summary stating they are present in 'Konkurso sąlygos'
Completeness90/100

All basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Seven documents are listed, including the ESPD, draft contract, and tender conditions, ensuring comprehensive information is available. Requirements and criteria are either defined or referenced in the attached documents.

Fairness90/100

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. Full document access is implied by the listing of documents. 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic, suggesting equal access, although this contradicts an automated check regarding e-submission.

Contradiction: 'E-Procurement' characteristic vs. automated flag 'No e-submission'
Practicality60/100

While 'E-Procurement' is listed, the automated check flags 'No e-submission', which is a significant practical concern if electronic submission is not truly supported. The contract start date is not specified, only the duration. Document URLs are not explicitly provided in the basic info, but documents are listed as available.

Contradiction: 'E-Procurement' characteristic vs. automated flag 'No e-submission'
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency50/100

There are multiple inconsistencies: 'Status: active' contradicts the 'Tender suspended' flag. The 'E-Procurement' characteristic contradicts the 'No e-submission' flag. The automated flag 'No evaluation criteria specified' contradicts the document summary. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

Contradiction: 'Status: active' vs. automated flag 'Tender suspended'
Contradiction: 'E-Procurement' characteristic vs. automated flag 'No e-submission'
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive description of services
All essential tender documents are listed and accessible
Requirements are well-structured and generic, promoting fair competition
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified

Concerns

Significant data inconsistencies across different information sources (e.g., status, e-submission)
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Uncertainty regarding actual e-submission capability despite 'E-Procurement' characteristic

Recommendations

1. Rectify all data inconsistencies, especially regarding tender status and e-submission functionality, to avoid confusion for bidders.
2. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria into future tenders to align with modern procurement best practices.
3. Ensure all key fields, such as 'Liable Person' and 'reveal date', are populated for full transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline