Tenders

GMO Monitoring Research and Reporting Services

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6492920
Value
€419,008
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€419,008
Duration
37 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
66
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€110,590
Avg. Bids
8.4
Competition
High
SME Winners
89%
364 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

GMO Monitoring Research and Reporting Services
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--All bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-17 10:00:00.
--Bidders must submit a comprehensive technical proposal detailing their methodology for "GMO monitoring research and report preparation services".
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal (price offer) in accordance with the tender specifications.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by applicable national and EU public procurement laws (e.g., bankruptcy, serious professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes or social security contributions, corruption, fraud). Specific details would be outlined in the full tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally established and authorized to operate in their country of registration.
--Bidders must be registered in a relevant professional or trade register as required by their national law.
--Bidders must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract for "GMO monitoring research and report preparation services".
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must demonstrate expertise and experience in GMO monitoring, scientific research methodologies, data analysis, and report preparation.
--Bidders are expected to propose qualified personnel with relevant scientific backgrounds (e.g., genetics, environmental science, biology) and experience in similar research projects.
--Bidders must demonstrate access to or ownership of necessary equipment and infrastructure for conducting GMO monitoring and research.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial and economic standing to perform a contract with an estimated value of 419,008.26 EUR over 37 months.
--Specific requirements regarding annual turnover, financial ratios, or insurance coverage will be detailed in the full tender documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Bendrosios Sutarties sąlygosDOC
10 priedas_Bendrosios _Sutarties sąlygos.docx

This document defines the general terms and key concepts of the service purchase-sale contract, forming the legal framework for the future agreement.

Specialiosios Sutarties sąlygosDOC
11 priedas_Specialiosios _Sutarties sąlygos.d...

This document outlines the special conditions of the service purchase-sale contract and includes a template for the service acceptance-handover act, detailing the buyer's information and providing fields for the supplier's details.

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Bendrosios_Sąlygos_AK_GMO.docx

This document defines key terms and abbreviations used in the public procurement process, including roles, documents like the ESPD, and legal frameworks, to ensure clear understanding of the tender conditions.

Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Specialiosios_Sąlygos_ AK_GMO.docx

This document outlines the special conditions for a green procurement tender by the Lithuanian Environmental Project Management Agency for GMO monitoring and report preparation services, emphasizing environmental criteria and a non-divisible service complex with a budget of €419,008.26 (excl. VAT).

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 79.9 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, outlining the self-declaration form bidders must complete to demonstrate their eligibility and qualifications for the GMO monitoring research and report preparation services tender.

NoticePDF
Notice_6492920.pdf

This contract notice announces an open tender by the Lithuanian Ministry of Environment's Environmental Project Management Agency for GMO monitoring research and report preparation services, with an estimated value of €419,008.26, funded partly by the EU LIFE program.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for GMO monitoring services presents a generally clear structure and comprehensive set of documents, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and several data inconsistencies, impacting fairness and transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and CPV codes. However, the crucial reveal date is missing, making it impossible to verify compliance with minimum legal timeframes for tender preparation. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there's a contradiction between 'Status: active' and 'Tender suspended' in the automated checks.

Missing tender reveal date
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Clarity60/100

The service description and categories of requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are clearly outlined. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' ability to understand how their proposals will be judged, making the tender documentation incomplete in a crucial aspect. AI summaries also indicate that specific details are deferred to full documents.

No evaluation criteria specified
Specific details of requirements are not fully summarized in the provided content
Completeness65/100

Basic information, financial details, and contract duration are provided, and a good number of documents are attached. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental component for bidders. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty, and specific requirement details are not fully presented in the provided summary.

Missing evaluation criteria
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Fairness60/100

Full document access, disclosed value, and indicated e-procurement contribute positively to fairness. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the transparency and objectivity of the selection process, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly. The missing reveal date also prevents verification of reasonable preparation time.

No evaluation criteria specified
Missing tender reveal date
Practicality70/100

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement', which is practical for submission, and contract duration and financing information are clearly stated. However, there is a contradiction in the provided data regarding e-submission ('E-Procurement' vs 'No e-submission'). The contract start date is not specified.

Contradiction regarding e-submission capabilities
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency60/100

Several inconsistencies are present, most notably the conflicting information regarding the tender's suspension status ('active' vs 'suspended'). The absence of a reveal date and an empty 'Liable Person' field also point to incomplete and inconsistent data entry. There's also a contradiction regarding e-submission.

Contradiction regarding tender status ('active' vs 'suspended')
Missing tender reveal date
Sustainability70/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'green procurement' and is 'EU Funded' (partly by the LIFE program), which are strong positive indicators for sustainability. However, it does not explicitly detail social aspects or an innovation focus.

No explicit social criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear service description and well-categorized requirements
EU-funded and explicitly includes green procurement conditions
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified
E-procurement is indicated, facilitating access

Concerns

Critical absence of specified evaluation criteria
Missing tender reveal date, hindering assessment of preparation time
Several data inconsistencies (e.g., 'active' vs. 'suspended', 'E-Procurement' vs. 'No e-submission')
'Liable Person' field is empty
AI-extracted requirements are high-level, with specific details deferred to full documents

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Clarify all data inconsistencies, especially regarding the tender's status and e-submission capabilities.
3. Ensure all mandatory fields, such as the tender reveal date and liable person, are populated for full legal compliance and transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline