Tenders

Services for the evaluation of applications for the EU programmes 'Erasmus+' and 'European Solidarity Corps'

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6447968
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
58
Quality Score/100
Fair
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of services for the evaluation of applications for the EU programmes 'Erasmus+' and 'European Solidarity Corps'
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-16 09:00:00.
--Specific submission documents, forms, or content requirements (e.g., technical proposal, financial proposal structure) are not provided in the given information.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per public procurement legislation (e.g., bankruptcy, insolvency, grave professional misconduct, corruption, fraud, non-payment of taxes or social security contributions). Specific details are not provided in the given information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be legally registered and authorized to perform the services in their country of establishment. Specific legal form or registration requirements are not provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must possess the necessary expertise and experience to provide evaluation consulting services for EU programs "Erasmus+" and "European Solidarity Corps" applications. Specific experience, personnel qualifications, or methodology requirements are not provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate financial and economic standing sufficient to perform the contract. Specific financial stability criteria (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance) are not provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

SutartisDOC
Paslaugu_sutarties_bendr+spec_salygos_su 3 pr...

This document is a draft service purchase-sale contract outlining the general terms, definitions, and buyer details for the evaluation services of Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps applications.

SąlygosDOC
PD_ES_programų_paraiškų_vertinimo_paslaugos_f...

This document outlines the conditions for the public procurement of application evaluation services for EU programs "Erasmus+" and "European Solidarity Corps", including qualification requirements, submission procedures, and contract provisions.

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 2 priedas Pasiūlymo forma.docx

This form requires bidders to provide company details, declare subcontractors, confirm agreement to tender conditions, describe service quantity criteria, and submit a detailed price offer for Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps application evaluation services.

Preliminarioji sutartisDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 3 priedas Preliminariosios sut...

This draft preliminary agreement outlines the framework for future contracts for evaluating Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps applications, detailing the scope, duration, and maximum value of services to be provided by the winning bidder.

Asmens duomen.DOC
Sutarties 3 priedas_ Asmens duomenų tvarkymo ...

This document is a draft Personal Data Processing Agreement outlining the responsibilities of the Data Controller (Jaunimo reikalų agentūra) and the Data Processor (the successful tenderer) under GDPR for the main service contract.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.4 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form, which bidders must complete to declare their eligibility and compliance with qualification criteria for providing evaluation services for Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps programs.

NoticePDF
Notice_6447968.pdf

This contract notice announces an open tender by the Lithuanian Youth Affairs Agency for evaluation consulting services for Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps program applications, with proposals to be submitted electronically in Lithuanian.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

58
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and detail, particularly regarding the undisclosed estimated value and missing evaluation criteria, which severely impact fairness and clarity for potential bidders. While basic legal compliance and e-procurement are present, the lack of specific requirements and sustainability focus are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender references EU directive 2014/24/ES and includes an ESPD form, indicating adherence to a legal framework. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant transparency and disclosure issue under procurement regulations.

Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity50/100

The overall description of services is clear, but the AI-extracted requirements indicate a severe lack of specific details regarding eligibility, technical capabilities, financial standing, and submission content. Crucially, evaluation criteria are explicitly flagged as missing, making it very difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific details for eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Completeness55/100

While basic information, deadlines, and documents are present, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of specific, detailed requirements and evaluation criteria. This leaves significant gaps for bidders attempting to formulate a comprehensive and competitive proposal.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific requirements (technical, financial, eligibility)
Fairness40/100

The undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria are critical fairness issues. Bidders cannot adequately prepare proposals or understand the basis of selection, leading to a highly opaque and potentially subjective procurement process. While e-procurement is enabled, these fundamental flaws undermine equal opportunity.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified, which are practical aspects. However, the lack of a specified contract start date and the undisclosed estimated value hinder practical planning and resource allocation for potential contractors.

Contract start date not specified
Estimated value not disclosed (hinders financial planning)
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the estimated value is not disclosed, representing minor data gaps.

Liable Person field is empty
Estimated value not disclosed
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it concerns EU programs, it is not explicitly stated as EU-funded, and therefore does not inherently benefit from higher sustainability standards often associated with direct EU funding.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and purpose
References EU procurement directive (2014/24/ES)
Electronic submission (E-Procurement) enabled
All tender documents are listed and summarized
CPV code is appropriately assigned

Concerns

Estimated value is not disclosed
Evaluation criteria are missing
Lack of specific details for eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Potential for subjective evaluation due to missing criteria
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value to ensure transparency and allow bidders to assess scope.
2. Clearly define and publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and objectivity.
3. Provide specific and comprehensive requirements for eligibility, technical capabilities, and financial standing.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline