Insurance of the first and second power units of AS "Latvenergo" TEC-2 plant

This tender presents a mixed quality assessment. While it demonstrates good clarity in its structure and requirements, significant concerns arise from the restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, severely impacting fairness and legal compliance.

The tender generally complies with procedural requirements, including a clear procedure type, reasonable deadline, and appropriate CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced. However, the undisclosed estimated value and restricted document access are significant concerns regarding transparency and full compliance with public disclosure principles, potentially hindering fair competition.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-structured, referring to specific documents for detailed information, including selection criteria and evaluation methodology. Performance conditions are clearly linked to technical specifications. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. Documents are listed and summarized, and requirements and criteria are defined by reference. The primary completeness issue is the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed', which is crucial information for potential bidders.

The most significant fairness concern is 'Restricted document access', which directly impedes equal access to information for all potential bidders. The 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' also limits bidders' ability to assess the opportunity fairly. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Electronic procurement is indicated, which is practical, and the contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and the estimated value is undisclosed, making financial planning difficult. 'Restricted document access' also creates a practical barrier for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.

Dates are logical and consistent, and the status (active, no disputes) is clear. Most key fields are populated. There is a minor contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' in the automated checks, but the 'Opening Place' suggests e-submission is functional. The main inconsistency is the undisclosed estimated value.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. While not always mandatory for all procurements, the absence of these elements means it does not contribute to broader sustainability goals.