Tenders

Disposable medical devices. Wound, rectum tips, stoma care, faecal drainage

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6440590
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
69
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Disposable medical devices. Wound, rectum tips, stoma care, faecal drainage
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (6)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Offer must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-17 10:00:00.
--Offer must be submitted in the required language (likely Lithuanian).
--Offer must cover all goods specified in the tender description.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS6
--Must not have been convicted of certain criminal offenses (e.g., corruption, fraud, money laundering, terrorism).
--Must have fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of taxes and social security contributions.
--Must not be bankrupt, insolvent, in liquidation, or have their assets administered by a liquidator or by the court.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be legally established and registered in a relevant business register.
--Must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
--Must comply with all applicable national laws and regulations.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be capable of supplying "Vienkartinės medicinos priemonės. Žaizdų, rectum antgaliai, stomų priemonės, išmatų drenavimo" (Disposable medical devices: Wound, rectum nozzles, stoma products, fecal drainage).
--Must ensure that all supplied medical devices comply with relevant EU and national medical device regulations (e.g., MDR 2017/745).
--Must be able to deliver goods for the entire contract duration of 37 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Must demonstrate sufficient financial and economic standing to perform the contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Sutarties projektasDOC
9 priedas. Sutarties projektas.docx

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and conditions for the purchase of disposable medical supplies, including wound dressings, rectal tips, stoma products, and fecal drainage systems, provided by Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė for potential suppliers to review.

Specialiosios sąlygosDOC
KUL Tarptautinis _SPECIALIOSIOS Sąlygos.docx

This document outlines the general and special conditions for the procurement of disposable medical devices, including wound care, stoma products, and drainage systems, specifying it's a green procurement divided into 10 parts with technical requirements detailed in an appendix.

Bendrosios sąlygosPDF
Bendrosios sąlygos.pdf

This document details the general conditions for the public procurement, including supplier qualification, tender submission requirements, evaluation criteria, and grounds for exclusion or rejection.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.5 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form, which bidders must complete to declare they meet the tender's qualification and exclusion criteria for disposable medical supplies.

NoticePDF
Notice_6440590.pdf

This document is a contract notice from Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė for an open tender to procure disposable medical devices, including wound, rectum, stoma, and fecal drainage supplies, outlining general procurement details and where to find full tender documents.

Pasiūlymo forma, techninė specifikacijaXLS
Pasiūlymo_forma_Techninė specifikacija.xlsx

This document is a proposal form for suppliers to provide their company details, contact information, and banking details for the tender concerning disposable medical supplies.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates a professional approach with comprehensive documentation and clear requirements, but significant concerns regarding the explicit statement of evaluation criteria and the undisclosed estimated value impact its overall quality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) with a clearly defined open procedure and appropriate CPV codes. The use of ESPD and inclusion of mandatory exclusion grounds are positive. However, the estimated value is not disclosed despite not being classified, which is a minor transparency concern.

Estimated value not disclosed despite not being classified.
Clarity65/100

While the general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main tender information or summaries significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. This makes it difficult to understand the basis for award decisions.

Evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated in the main tender information or AI summaries.
Completeness70/100

The tender provides most essential information, including basic details, deadlines, and duration. A comprehensive set of documents is available. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the evaluation criteria are not explicitly defined, which are notable gaps in completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Evaluation criteria not explicitly defined.
Fairness60/100

The tender supports e-procurement and its requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, more critically, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and fairness, making it challenging for bidders to prepare competitive and informed offers.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly stated, impacting transparency and objectivity.
Estimated value not disclosed, reducing market transparency.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and detailed financing information beyond the undisclosed value is absent. The document URL is implied but not explicitly provided.

Contract start date not specified.
Detailed financing information beyond value not available.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The main consistency gaps are the undisclosed estimated value and the missing reveal date, but these do not create contradictions.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Reveal date not provided.
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions green procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, it does not include specific social aspects or an innovation focus, nor is it stated to be EU funded, limiting its broader sustainability impact.

Lacks explicit social aspects.
No clear innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear definition of procurement type and legal framework (EU Directive 2014/24/ES).
Comprehensive set of supporting documents available.
E-procurement enabled for efficient submission.
AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and clear.
Explicit mention of green procurement.

Concerns

Evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated, hindering transparency and fairness.
Estimated value is not disclosed despite not being classified.
Contract start date is missing.
Lack of explicit social aspects or innovation focus.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly state all evaluation criteria and their weighting to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value to provide bidders with better market context.
3. Specify the contract start date for better planning by potential suppliers.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline