Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login6 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
10 documents available with AI summaries
This document provides a glossary of key terms and abbreviations, including definitions for participants, the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), subcontractors, and various contract types, essential for understanding the tender conditions.
This document is a proposal form for repair works on non-residential buildings in Mažeikiai District Municipality, requiring bidders to provide company details, information on relied-upon entities and subcontractors, and the proposed price in Euros.
This document outlines the special procurement conditions for the repair works of non-residential buildings belonging to Mažeikiai district municipality, covering general information, the procurement object, green procurement, and qualification requirements.
This document outlines the special procurement conditions for repair works of non-residential buildings owned by Mažeikiai district municipality, detailing green procurement requirements, object specifications, and initial qualification criteria.
This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and conditions for repair works on non-residential buildings and premises owned by Mažeikių District Municipality, including scope, duration, and payment.
This document outlines the technical specifications for repair works on non-residential buildings owned by Mažeikiai District Municipality, detailing legal compliance, safety standards, material requirements, and operational procedures for contractors.
This document provides an answer to an inquiry and announces the postponement of the tender submission deadline to 2026-02-10.
This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, requiring companies to self-declare their compliance with the tender's qualification and exclusion criteria for the renovation works.
Mažeikiai District Municipality is seeking bids for renovation works on its non-residential buildings and their appurtenances, valued at approximately 412,212.39 Euro, under an open procedure that includes green procurement criteria.
This document details the scope of repair works for non-residential buildings, including specific plumbing tasks, and requires bidders to provide unit and total prices for each item.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender exhibits good legal compliance and includes green procurement aspects, but suffers from critical deficiencies in clarity and fairness due to missing evaluation criteria and poorly structured requirements.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and uses an appropriate CPV code. Mandatory disclosures are met, and the inclusion of ESPD indicates compliance with EU regulations. The status is active, and no disputes are reported, despite a previous deadline postponement which is a normal procedural adjustment.
A significant concern is the explicit flag of 'Missing evaluation criteria,' which is fundamental for bidders. Furthermore, the AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical, and financial aspects are stated as 'No specific... detailed,' suggesting these critical requirements are either absent from the overview or not clearly structured within the documents, hindering bidder understanding.
While basic information, value, duration, and a comprehensive set of documents are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of clearly defined evaluation criteria. The lack of structured eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the AI summary also points to a deficiency in easily accessible, complete information.
The most critical issue impacting fairness is the 'Missing evaluation criteria.' Without transparent and objective criteria for evaluating bids, the procurement process cannot ensure fair competition, as bidders are unable to understand how their proposals will be judged. While document access and value disclosure are positive, this omission is severe.
Electronic submission is stated as a characteristic, which enhances practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided. There is a minor contradiction in the automated checks regarding e-submission, but the explicit characteristic is prioritized.
Most key fields are populated, and dates appear logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency noted is within the automated check's output, which contradicts itself regarding 'Tender suspended' versus 'Status: active' and 'Disputes Count: 0'. The tender data itself is largely consistent.
The tender positively includes 'green procurement criteria' as highlighted in multiple documents. However, it lacks explicit mention of social aspects or an innovation focus, and it is not specified as EU-funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required