Tenders

Expertise Services for Building Projects

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6391947
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
63
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The supplier undertakes to perform services for the buyer AB KVJUD under the conditions and in the manner specified in the contract.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the given tender information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documents for detailed requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided in the given tender information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documents for detailed requirements.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the given tender information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documents for detailed requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the given tender information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documents for detailed requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the given tender information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documents for detailed requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Atliktų darbų aktasDOC
2+priedas+atliktu+darbu+aktas.docx

This document is a template for an Act of Acceptance-Transfer of Services Performed, used to formally record and value completed services under the contract.

Pirkimo dokumentų 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ir 8 priedaiDOC
Pirkimo dokumentu 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ir 8 pr...

This document is a proposal form for building project expertise services, requiring bidders to confirm agreement with tender terms, provide detailed pricing, and list company and subcontractor information.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 84.1 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, a mandatory self-declaration form for bidders to confirm they meet the qualification criteria and are not subject to exclusion grounds for the building project expertise services tender.

NoticePDF
Notice_6391947.pdf

This tender seeks expert services for comprehensive and partial evaluations of building projects, including technical, working, and demolition plans, as well as assessments of project proposals and cost justifications for the Klaipėda State Seaport Authority.

Pirkimo dokumentai - statinių ekspertizių pirkimasPDF
Pirkimo dokumentai - statiniu ekspertiziu pir...

This document outlines the general conditions, qualification requirements, proposal submission guidelines, and contract terms for the procurement of building project expertise services for the Klaipėda State Seaport Authority.

Pirkimo dokumentų - 10 priedas (sutarties projektas)PDF
Pirkimo dokumentu - 10 priedas (suatarties pr...

This draft service contract outlines the terms for providing general and partial expertises of building projects, including changes, additions, and demolition projects, for the Klaipėda State Seaport Authority, specifying service scope, location, and timelines.

SUTARTIES PROJEKTO 1 PRIEDASXLS
SUTARTIES PROJEKTO 1 PRIEDAS.xlsx

This document is an annex to the draft contract, detailing the types of construction project expertise services required, their estimated quantities, and provides a template for bidders to submit their proposed service rates based on project cost ranges.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for building project expertise services demonstrates good legal compliance and document availability, but suffers from significant transparency issues regarding the estimated value and evaluation criteria. These omissions severely impact fairness and clarity for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type (Open, 2014/25/ES) and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated contract value is a notable transparency issue, which, while not always strictly illegal, deviates from best practice in public procurement.

Estimated contract value not disclosed.
Clarity60/100

While a comprehensive set of documents is available, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria in the overview, which is a critical omission for bidders. The AI-extracted requirements are generic, forcing bidders to meticulously review all attached documents for essential details.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly specified.
AI-extracted requirements are generic, lacking immediate detail.
Completeness65/100

Basic information, deadlines, and contract duration are provided, and all documents are attached. However, the estimated contract value is missing, and the evaluation criteria are not clearly defined in the main tender overview, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated contract value not disclosed.
Evaluation criteria not explicitly defined in the overview.
Fairness50/100

The absence of a disclosed estimated contract value and explicitly defined evaluation criteria are major fairness concerns. These omissions can hinder equal competition, make it difficult for bidders to assess the opportunity, and introduce subjectivity into the evaluation process.

Estimated contract value not disclosed.
Evaluation criteria not specified, impacting transparency and objectivity.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clear. However, the lack of an explicit contract start date and, more significantly, the undisclosed estimated value, make practical planning and financial assessment challenging for potential suppliers.

Estimated contract value not disclosed.
Contract start date not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistencies are the undisclosed estimated value and the empty 'Liable Person' field.

Estimated contract value not disclosed.
'Liable Person' field is empty.
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No social aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear procedure type and CPV code.
Comprehensive set of tender documents available.
E-Procurement enabled for submission.
Contract duration clearly specified.
No reported disputes or suspensions.

Concerns

Estimated contract value is not disclosed, impacting transparency and fairness.
Evaluation criteria are not explicitly specified, leading to potential subjectivity.
AI-extracted requirements are generic, requiring bidders to thoroughly review all documents.
No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects.
Missing contract start date and liable person.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and attract a wider range of bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to ensure objectivity and fairness in the selection process.
3. Provide a more detailed summary of key requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) in the main tender notice.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline