Tenders

Project proposals for the object 'Construction project of a coastal protection structure in the Curonian Spit, Neringa Municipality'

Open
Deadline
9 days left
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6387152
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
33 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
61
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Project proposals for the object 'Construction project of a coastal protection structure in the Curonian Spit, Neringa Municipality'.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-12 09:00:00.
--Bids should likely be submitted in Lithuanian, unless otherwise specified in the full tender documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements found in the provided metadata. Bidders must comply with general public procurement exclusion grounds as per applicable law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements found in the provided metadata. Bidders must meet general eligibility criteria as per applicable law.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements found in the provided metadata. Bidders are expected to be capable of providing engineering design services (CPV Category: Inžinerinio projektavimo paslaugos).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements found in the provided metadata.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

DVP-22 PIRKIMO DOKUMENTAI.docDOC
DVP-22 PIRKIMO DOKUMENTAI.doc -- 620.5 KB

This document outlines the general terms, conditions, and submission requirements for engineering design services for a coastal protection structure project in the Curonian Spit.

9 PRIEDAS Sutarties_projektas_PP_ir_TDP.docxDOC
9 PRIEDAS Sutarties_projektas_PP_ir_TDP.docx -- 65.7 KB

This document outlines the draft contract terms for engineering design services related to the coastal protection structure project in the Curonian Spit, Neringa municipality.

NoticePDF
Notice_6387152.pdf

This tender seeks engineering design services for a coastal protection structure in the Curonian Spit, encompassing design proposals, technical work project preparation, and construction project supervision.

TP 2025-12-02_projektavimo_uzduotis_Nr._T-112 (1).pdfPDF
TP 2025-12-02_projektavimo_uzduotis_Nr._T-112... -- 1.2 MB

This document outlines the detailed design task and technical requirements for the coastal protection structure project in the Curonian Spit.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for engineering design services is generally well-structured with clear project details and e-procurement, but suffers from significant transparency issues due to undisclosed estimated value and missing evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines a clear procedure type (Open, under Directive 2014/25/ES) and uses an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the reveal date is missing, which are minor transparency issues.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing reveal date
Clarity55/100

The project description is clear, but the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state a lack of specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the metadata. Crucially, evaluation criteria are not specified, which significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how proposals will be judged.

Missing evaluation criteria
AI-extracted requirements lack specificity for eligibility, technical, and financial aspects
Completeness60/100

Basic information, documents, duration, and location are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the critical evaluation criteria are missing from the summary. The AI-extracted requirements also indicate a lack of specific details for key areas.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness50/100

E-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impact transparency and the ability for all bidders to compete fairly and prepare informed proposals.

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not known, and the estimated value is not disclosed, which can create practical challenges for bidders in planning and resource allocation.

Contract start date not known
Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates (submission/opening) are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the estimated value is explicitly 'Not disclosed', indicating some data omissions.

Liable Person field is empty
Estimated value not disclosed
Sustainability20/100

There is no explicit mention or integration of green procurement principles, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information or AI summaries.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and CPV code
E-procurement enabled for submission
All tender documents are attached and accessible
Defined procedure type (Open, EU Directive 2014/25/ES)
No disputes or suspensions reported

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria, severely impacting clarity and fairness
Estimated value not disclosed, hindering transparency and bidder planning
AI-extracted requirements lack specificity for eligibility, technical, and financial aspects
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Contract start date not specified

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish comprehensive evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract to aid bidder planning and market understanding.
3. Ensure all specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are clearly detailed and easily identifiable within the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline