Coaching for Be Active Programmes and Indoor Leisure Classes (Tender Ref 16/2025)

This tender for coaching services exhibits moderate quality, providing clear basic information and a well-defined scope. However, significant concerns arise from the absence of detailed evaluation criteria, lack of specified mandatory exclusion grounds, and the absence of electronic submission, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender defines the procedure type and correctly assigns CPV codes. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information is a significant legal compliance concern. The 'missing reveal date' also impacts transparency regarding the tender's initial publication.

The service description is clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it challenging for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly impacting the overall clarity of the tender process.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are well-provided. All listed documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the missing detailed evaluation criteria and the lack of specified mandatory exclusion grounds.

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity. Additionally, the lack of an e-submission option creates potential barriers to equal access for all bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing information (estimated value) is available. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor gaps include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing 'Code' for Type and Procedure, but these do not significantly impact overall consistency.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social criteria beyond the service's inherent nature, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.