Tenders

Equipment for Physician Otorhinolaryngologist (Open)

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6343051
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Taurage County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Taurage County
Type
Other
66
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Tauragė District Municipality Central Purchasing Organisation is conducting an international value public procurement
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per national public procurement law (e.g., bankruptcy, insolvency, serious professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes or social security contributions).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

3DOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios 11-25 paskelbimui....

This document defines key terms and abbreviations, including participant, supplier, subcontractor, and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), essential for understanding the tender's requirements and qualifications.

1DOC
Spec.salygos.gyd.oto.darbo vieta.2026 01 29.d...

This document provides general information about the procurement of ENT doctor's workstation equipment, detailing the procurement process, green procurement criteria, contact persons, and the object of the purchase.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 85.5 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, outlining the qualification and exclusion criteria that bidders must meet to participate in the tender for otorhinolaryngologist's workplace equipment.

Klausimai 2026 02 04PDF
Klausimai Dokumento Nuorašas 2026-02-04.pdf

This document contains the contracting authority's responses to supplier questions regarding the technical specifications for ENT doctor's workstation equipment, with the authority rejecting proposed changes.

NoticePDF
Notice_6343051.pdf

This notice announces an open international public procurement by Tauragės District Municipality Administration for ENT doctor's workstation equipment for Tauragė Hospital, funded by EU NextGenerationEU.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for ENT workstation equipment demonstrates good adherence to EU procurement standards and e-procurement, but is significantly hampered by the absence of evaluation criteria and undisclosed estimated value.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type (Open, EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and CPV codes, utilizes ESPD, and is EU funded. However, the reveal date is missing, and the estimated value is not disclosed, which are minor transparency shortcomings.

Missing reveal date
Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity60/100

While the tender description and object are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Basic information, deadlines, and document availability are good. However, the tender lacks the estimated value and, most importantly, detailed evaluation criteria, which are essential for a complete procurement package.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness55/100

Full document access and e-procurement support promote fairness. Nevertheless, the undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromise the objectivity and transparency of the bidding process.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality70/100

Electronic submission is supported, and financing details are provided. The contract duration is clear, though the specific contract start date and a direct document URL are not explicitly stated.

Contract start date not specified
Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include the missing liable person and the undisclosed estimated value. Automated check flags regarding suspension and e-submission were contradictory to primary data and ignored.

Liable person not specified
Estimated value not disclosed
Sustainability60/100

The tender mentions green procurement criteria and is EU funded, indicating a positive step towards sustainability. However, there is no explicit focus on social aspects or innovation.

No explicit social criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear procurement object and organization
Adherence to EU procurement standards (2014/24/ES, ESPD)
E-Procurement enabled and EU funded
Green procurement criteria mentioned
Documents available with some clarifications

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria (critical)
Estimated value not disclosed
Missing tender reveal date
Missing liable person
Potential for tailored technical specifications (unconfirmed)

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria immediately to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value to provide better market insight for potential bidders.
3. Ensure all key administrative fields, such as the liable person and tender reveal date, are consistently populated in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline