Tenders

Laboratory (Subcontractor) Services Purchase (Categories 101-129)

Open
Deadline
5508 days left
April 01, 2041
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6332767
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2041

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2041

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
62
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of laboratory (subcontractor) services (categories 101-129).
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements were provided in the tender information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for detailed instructions on bid submission.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were provided in the tender information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for standard exclusion criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements were provided in the tender information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for detailed criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements were provided in the tender information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for detailed criteria related to laboratory services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements were provided in the tender information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for detailed criteria.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

DPS sukurimo sąlygosDOC
DPS_sukurimo salygos 101-129 kateg.docx

This document outlines the conditions for participating in the procurement of laboratory services, specifically detailing the mandatory grounds for exclusion of suppliers due to criminal offenses and requiring documentation to prove the absence of such grounds.

Konkretaus pirkimo sąlygų projektasDOC
Konkretaus pirkimo_ sąlygų projektas prie DPS...

This document is a draft template for tender submission, requiring companies to provide their legal entity details, contact person, and accountant's information for the National Food and Veterinary Risk Assessment Institute.

NoticePDF
Notice_6332767.pdf

This notice announces a restricted procurement by the National Food and Veterinary Risk Assessment Institute in Lithuania for laboratory (subcontractor) services across 29 categories, including pesticide detection, with a focus on green and social procurement.

Paaiškinimas dėl DPS aplinkosPDF
Paaiškinimas dėl DPS aplinkos sukūrimo.pdf

This document clarifies that the National Food and Veterinary Risk Assessment Institute has split its Dynamic Purchasing System for laboratory services into two separate procurement IDs (1-100 categories and 101-129 categories) due to system limitations and official recommendations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for laboratory services, structured as a Dynamic Purchasing System, demonstrates good legal compliance and basic information, but suffers from significant clarity and fairness issues due to missing evaluation criteria and undisclosed value.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender correctly identifies the restricted procedure type under EU directive 2014/24/ES and uses the appropriate CPV code. The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) with a long validity period (until 2041) is a legally compliant procurement method. Mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in Document 5, addressing a potential concern raised by the AI summary.

Estimated value is not disclosed, which can impact transparency.
Clarity50/100

The overall description is brief, and the AI-extracted summary of requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) states they are 'not provided,' which is misleading as some (e.g., exclusion grounds) are found in attached documents. However, the most significant clarity issue is the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. Performance conditions are also not clearly stated.

Missing evaluation criteria
General requirements not clearly summarized in the main tender overview
Completeness60/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. Documents are attached, and the DPS validity period is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the specific duration of individual contracts within the DPS is not provided. Crucially, comprehensive eligibility, technical, financial, and all evaluation criteria are not fully defined or clearly presented in the tender overview.

Undisclosed estimated value
Missing specific contract duration
Fairness40/100

The tender supports e-procurement and provides access to documents, which promotes equal access. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value hinders bidders' ability to assess the opportunity fairly. The most critical fairness concern is the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, which introduces significant subjectivity and potential for bias in the selection process.

Undisclosed estimated value
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender supports electronic submission, which is practical for bidders. However, the contract start date is not known, and specific financing information (beyond the undisclosed value) is absent. While the DPS validity is long, the duration of individual contracts is not specified, which impacts practical planning for potential suppliers.

Missing contract start date
Undisclosed value/financing information
Data Consistency70/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the long submission deadline is consistent with a Dynamic Purchasing System. However, there is an inconsistency between the AI-extracted summary stating 'No specific... requirements' and the content of Document 5, which details mandatory exclusion grounds. The automated check also contained some incorrect flags.

Inconsistency between AI summary of requirements and document content
Undisclosed value
Sustainability70/100

The tender notice (Document 6) explicitly mentions a focus on 'green and social procurement,' which is a positive aspect. However, there is no specific mention of an innovation focus within the provided information.

No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear identification of procurement type (Restricted, DPS) and CPV code.
Support for E-Procurement and division into parts, promoting competition.
Explicit mention of green and social procurement aspects.
Documents are available and provide additional context (e.g., DPS clarification, exclusion grounds).

Concerns

Critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, severely impacting clarity and fairness.
Estimated value is not disclosed, hindering bidder assessment.
AI-extracted requirements summary is misleading, indicating a lack of clear presentation of requirements in the main tender.
Lack of specific contract duration and start date for individual call-offs.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the DPS or provide clear guidance on how individual call-off values will be communicated.
3. Ensure all key requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) are clearly summarized in the main tender overview or explicitly referenced with document locations.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline