Tenders

Qualified Electronic Signature Qualified Timestamping Services in Real Time

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6330381
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
38 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
64
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€414,969
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
1,352 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of qualified electronic signature qualified timestamping services in real time.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per applicable public procurement laws. Specific grounds are not detailed in the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

0_pirkimo sąlygosDOC
0_priedas_pirkimo_sąlygos_LŽ.docx

This document outlines the general terms, conditions, and procedural deadlines for the open international tender for qualified electronic signature real-time timestamping services.

1_pasiūlymo formaDOC
1_priedas_pasiūlymo_forma_LŽ.docx

This document is a mandatory proposal form for suppliers to provide their company details, contact information, and declarations for the qualified electronic signature real-time time-stamping services tender.

2_techninė specifikacijaDOC
2_priedas_techninė_specifikacija_LŽ.docx

This document outlines the technical specifications for real-time qualified electronic signature timestamping services, requiring compliance with eIDAS Regulation and ETSI standards, and provision by a qualified trust service provider for a 36-month period.

3_bendrosios sutarties sąlygosDOC
3_priedas_bendrosios sutarties sąlygos.docx

This document outlines the general terms and conditions of the service purchase-sale contract, defining key concepts and the legal framework for the agreement.

4_specialiosios sutarties sąlygosDOC
4_priedas_ specialiosios sutarties sąlygos_LŽ...

This document outlines the special conditions and party details for the service purchase-sale contract, serving as a template for the final agreement.

6_deklaracijaDOC
6_priedas_Nacionalinio saugumo reikalavimų at...

This document is a mandatory declaration form for suppliers to confirm that their proposed goods (software) or services comply with national security requirements, ensuring they are not sourced from restricted countries/territories.

5_EBVPDPDF
5_priedas_EBVPD.pdf

This European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is a self-declaration form for bidders to confirm they meet the tender's qualification requirements and are not subject to exclusion grounds.

7_atmintinėPDF
7_priedas_atmintinė.pdf

This document likely provides guidelines or general information regarding the tender for real-time qualified electronic signature time stamp services.

NoticePDF
Notice_6330381.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an open tender by the National Energy Regulatory Council of Lithuania for qualified electronic signature real-time timestamping services, detailing the procurement procedure, scope, and where to find full tender documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for real-time timestamping services is well-documented with clear technical specifications and utilizes e-procurement, but it significantly lacks transparency and fairness due to the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type (Open, EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the missing tender reveal date are significant transparency issues that impact legal compliance with disclosure requirements.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing tender reveal date
Clarity60/100

The service description and technical specifications appear clear, and contract conditions are provided. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the clarity for bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed. Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are also not detailed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Specific mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed
Completeness65/100

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are present, and a comprehensive set of documents is attached. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the absence of defined evaluation criteria, which are crucial for bidders.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness50/100

While e-procurement is enabled, the fairness of the process is severely undermined by the non-disclosure of the estimated value and, most critically, the complete absence of evaluation criteria. This lack of transparency makes it challenging for bidders to prepare competitive and informed proposals and raises concerns about the objectivity of the selection process.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality70/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the absence of a specific contract start date and the undisclosed estimated value reduce practicality for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided, though assumed via e-procurement.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information (estimated value) not available
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The primary inconsistency is the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' despite 'Value Classified: No', implying it should be public. A minor inconsistency exists between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' in automated checks.

Estimated value not disclosed despite not being classified
Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated check
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which typically encourages higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and technical specifications
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided
Utilizes E-Procurement for submission
References EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES)
No reported disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Estimated value is not disclosed, hindering bidder assessment
Crucial evaluation criteria are not specified, impacting transparency and fairness
Missing tender reveal date, making it impossible to assess the full preparation period
Lack of explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations
Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided summary

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish the estimated value of the contract to ensure full transparency and allow bidders to prepare informed proposals.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and methodology to ensure fairness and objectivity in the selection process.
3. Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly detailed or referenced in the main tender documents for clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline