T26-024BUS Event Management Support Tender - Restricted List

This tender is of moderate quality, presenting a clear objective but suffering from significant deficiencies in evaluation criteria and data consistency. While practical in its submission method, the lack of transparency in assessment methods is a major concern.

Legal compliance is moderate due to ambiguous procedure type (Open vs. Restricted List EOI), the absence of a liable person, and the AI's inability to identify specific mandatory exclusion grounds from the provided text. The 'Below threshold' nature implies less stringent EU rules, but national regulations still apply.

Clarity is poor primarily due to the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for inclusion on the Restricted List. While the overall purpose of the EOI is clear, applicants lack essential information on how their submissions will be assessed, making it difficult to prepare effectively.

Completeness is moderate. While basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria. The AI summary also indicates a lack of detailed financial and mandatory exclusion requirements.

Fairness is poor, mainly because of the critical lack of specified evaluation criteria. This omission severely impacts transparency and objectivity, potentially leading to an arbitrary selection process. The contradictory 'Value Classified' status also raises minor transparency concerns.

Practicality is good. Electronic submission via etendersNI is clearly mandated, which is efficient. Key contract dates and duration are well-defined, and financing information is available. The absence of an explicit document URL in the basic information is a minor point.

Data consistency is moderate due to several contradictions. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there's a discrepancy between the stated 'Type: Open' and 'Procedure: Below threshold - open competition' versus the description of an EOI for a 'Restricted List'. Furthermore, 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the disclosed 'Estimated Value'.

Sustainability aspects are very poor. The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate modern procurement best practices.