Tenders

Supply and delivery of Sharps Disposal Protection Unit and/or Pads

Open
Deadline
23 days left
March 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017578-2026
Value
£1,012,000
Location
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 26, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Budget
£1,012,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Northern Ireland
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Business Services Organisation (BSO), Procurement and Logistics Service (PaLS) is seeking to establish a Contract(s) for the supply and delivery of Sharps Disposal Protection Units and/or Pads to Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland (HSCNI).

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for sharps disposal units is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and does not explicitly address sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the subject of the procurement. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of specified exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements significantly detract from its completeness.

No document content available
Missing specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially tight, is provided. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency in evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the availability of document URLs hinders practical application. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission indicated
Document URLs not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent with a typical procurement timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Reference number and organization specified
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Absence of detailed submission and capability requirements
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide full content for all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects where relevant.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline