Tenders

Construction works for a special-purpose building - fire station with an annex, Lauko g.19, Jurbarkas

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
5952743
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
16 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Other
60
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction works for a special-purpose building - fire station with an annex, Lauko g.19, Jurbarkas
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-09 09:30:00.
--Specific submission requirements (e.g., required forms, declarations, technical proposals, financial offers) are not provided in the given information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documentation for detailed instructions on bid content and format.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not provided in the given information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documentation for detailed requirements, typically including grounds related to criminal convictions, unpaid taxes/social security, bankruptcy, etc.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific eligibility requirements are not provided in the given information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documentation for detailed requirements, typically including legal capacity to perform the contract and registration in relevant professional or trade registers.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific technical capability requirements are not provided in the given information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documentation for detailed requirements, typically including experience in similar construction projects (e.g., fire stations), qualified personnel, and necessary equipment.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific financial requirements are not provided in the given information. Bidders must refer to the full tender documentation for detailed requirements, typically including minimum annual turnover, financial stability, and insurance.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

1 PAGD PD BSDOC
1 PAGD PD BS.docx

This document outlines the public procurement procedures, legal acts, communication channels, and key terms for the Jurbarkas fire station construction tender.

2 PAGD PD SS (aktuali 2025-12-23)DOC
2 PAGD PD SS (aktuali 2025-12-23).docx

This document outlines the grounds for supplier exclusion and the qualification requirements that bidders must meet to submit proposals for the Jurbarkas fire station construction works.

2 PAGD PD SSDOC
2 PAGD PD SS.docx

This document provides general procurement information, outlines grounds for supplier exclusion, and details high-level supplier qualification requirements for the construction of a special-purpose fire station in Jurbarkas.

4 PAGD PD PFDOC
4 PAGD PD PF.docx

This document provides essential forms and instructions for submitting your tender proposal, detailing supplier information, subcontractor involvement, environmental management plans, and pricing for the Jurbarkas fire station construction project.

6 PAGD PD FKDOC
6 PAGD PD FK.docx

This document outlines the qualification criteria for bidders, requesting information on their right to operate, average annual revenue, and a list of specialists for the construction of a special-purpose fire station.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 84.3 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, which bidders must complete to declare their eligibility and compliance with qualification criteria for the fire station construction tender.

NoticePDF
Notice_5952743.pdf

This is an open tender notice for the construction of a special-purpose fire station with a shelter in Jurbarkas, Lithuania, funded partly by the European Regional Development Fund, with environmental impact reduction as a strategic goal.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

60
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a fire station in Jurbarkas exhibits good legal compliance and general practicality, but suffers from significant clarity, completeness, and fairness issues due to undisclosed estimated value and, critically, missing evaluation criteria. Data consistency is also a major concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES, OPEN procedure) with appropriate CPV codes and the use of ESPD. The status is active with no reported disputes. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a transparency concern but not necessarily a legal non-compliance if permitted by national law.

Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity50/100

While the project description is clear, the tender documentation lacks explicit evaluation criteria, which is a major deficiency. The AI-extracted requirements are also vague, indicating that key details are not readily apparent without extensive document review.

Missing evaluation criteria
AI-extracted requirements are vague/incomplete
Completeness60/100

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided, and documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial evaluation criteria are missing, significantly impacting the completeness of essential tender information.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness40/100

The tender supports e-procurement and provides full document access. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of clear, objective evaluation criteria severely compromise the fairness and transparency of the procurement process, making it difficult for bidders to compete effectively.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality75/100

The tender specifies EU funding and contract duration, and implies electronic submission. However, the contract start date is not provided, and explicit document URLs are absent, which could slightly hinder practical access.

Contract start date not specified
Document URLs not explicitly provided
Data Consistency30/100

There are significant contradictions within the provided data, notably between the 'active' status and an automated flag indicating 'Tender suspended,' and between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission.' The 'Liable Person' field is also empty. These inconsistencies raise concerns about data reliability.

Contradiction on tender status (active vs. suspended)
Contradiction on e-submission (E-Procurement vs. No e-submission)
Sustainability65/100

The tender is EU funded and mentions 'environmental impact reduction as a strategic goal' in one document summary, indicating some green procurement aspects. However, it lacks explicit social criteria or a focus on innovation.

No explicit social criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear project description
EU funded
E-Procurement enabled
Good legal compliance framework
Documents are available

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Undisclosed estimated value
Significant data inconsistencies (especially tender status)
Vague AI-extracted requirements

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value for transparency.
2. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
3. Resolve data inconsistencies to ensure reliability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline