Reconstruction of the municipal land reclamation system in the area adjacent to the eastern part of Preiļi City Park

The overall quality of this tender is moderate, with strengths in clarity and data consistency, but significant deficiencies in legal compliance, fairness, and sustainability. Key concerns include restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value.

The 'Restricted document access' flag is a major concern for an open procedure, potentially undermining transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental legal principles. While deadlines are reasonable, the procedure type is clear, and CPV codes are correct, this access restriction significantly lowers the score.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-documented and understandable, covering all necessary aspects. Evaluation criteria, specifically 'lowest price', are explicitly stated, which enhances clarity.

While basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, the estimated value is not disclosed. The 'Restricted document access' also impacts the completeness from a bidder's perspective, as full information might not be readily available.

The 'Restricted document access' and the undisclosed estimated value are significant barriers to fair competition and transparency. Although requirements appear generic and evaluation criteria are objective, these access and disclosure issues severely compromise fairness.

E-procurement is indicated, suggesting electronic submission is supported despite a contradictory automated check flag. However, the contract start date is not specified, and detailed financing information beyond 'Not EU funded' is absent, reducing overall practicality.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. However, there is a contradiction regarding e-submission between the characteristics and automated checks, and the estimated value is missing, slightly impacting overall consistency.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to incorporate modern sustainability principles.