Installation of small infrastructure and equipment in Vārve parish, Ventspils municipality

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness due to restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and missing evaluation criteria, despite clear basic information and EU funding.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant legal transparency concern, hindering compliance with open procurement principles.

The tender title and description are clear, and AI-extracted requirements are understandable. However, the explicit flag 'No evaluation criteria specified' is a critical flaw, as it leaves bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be judged, despite document summaries claiming they exist.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, evaluation criteria are flagged as missing, and document access is restricted, significantly impacting the completeness of accessible information.

Fairness is severely compromised by restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and the absence of specified evaluation criteria. The flag 'No e-submission' also contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating an unequal playing field if electronic submission is not truly supported.

The lack of electronic submission ('No e-submission' flag) is a major practical drawback for bidders. While EU funding is noted, the contract start date is not specified, only the duration.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable inconsistency between 'E-Procurement' being listed as a characteristic and 'No e-submission' being flagged. Additionally, the contradiction regarding the presence of evaluation criteria (summaries vs. flags) indicates data inconsistency.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, as indicated by the automated checks. While EU funded, this does not translate into specific sustainability requirements for this project.