Latvia28 days leftOpen

Supply of invasive cardiology instrumentation and medical devices - Medical goods

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Latgale, Latvia

VALUE

€6,000,000

DEADLINE

March 02, 2026 at 09:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

33100000

REFERENCE

164560

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Supply of invasive cardiology instrumentation and medical devices - Medical goods
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Must not be subject to any of the mandatory exclusion conditions specified in the tender document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Must satisfy all general selection criteria detailed in the tender document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Must ensure that all offered invasive cardiology instruments and medical supplies strictly comply with the technical specifications outlined in "Nolikumus ar pielikumiem".
  • Must submit a technical proposal that addresses all specific technical requirements detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
  • Must demonstrate the capability to supply the required invasive cardiology instruments and medical products to Daugavpils Regional Hospital.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Must submit a financial proposal that adheres to all financial requirements specified in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
  • Must meet any financial selection criteria outlined in the tender documents.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Must submit a complete bid package in accordance with the detailed submission requirements outlined in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
  • Must ensure the bid includes both a technical and a financial proposal.
  • Must submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-02T09:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija
technical_spec164560_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260129052556.pdf99.8 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the detailed requirements for submitting a bid to Daugavpils Regional Hospital for the supply of invasive cardiology instruments and medical devices, covering exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.
XLS
Nolikums ar pielikumiem
technical_spec1_pielikums_tehniska_specifikacija.xlsx51.2 KB
Summary:
This document contains the technical specifications for an open tender concerning the supply of invasive cardiology instruments and medical supplies, identified as DRS 2025/95.
HTM
Main tender page
tender_noticeindex.html
Summary:
This document contains the basic data for the "DRS 2025/95" open tender for the supply of invasive cardiology instruments and medical products for Daugavpils Regional Hospital, including key dates, estimated value, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

47
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender for medical supplies exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness due to restricted document access and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, severely hindering potential bidders. While basic information and data consistency are good, these critical flaws undermine the integrity of the procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance50/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and the timeline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a severe legal compliance issue, directly violating principles of transparency and equal treatment in public procurement.

Restricted document access
Clarity45/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are referenced to specific documents. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness40/100

Basic information, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the 'Restricted document access', which prevents bidders from accessing all necessary information.

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Fairness25/100

Fairness is severely compromised by 'Restricted document access' and the 'No evaluation criteria specified'. These issues prevent equal access to information and introduce significant subjectivity into the evaluation process, undermining transparency and equal treatment.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality55/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the 'Restricted document access' creates a significant practical barrier for bidders to obtain necessary documentation, making participation challenging despite e-procurement capabilities.

Restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

All key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good internal data integrity.

Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear definition of the procurement type and procedure (open, supplies).
Comprehensive basic information provided (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines).
Good data consistency across populated fields and logical dates.
Electronic procurement (E-Procurement) is enabled, facilitating submission.
Estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency.

Concerns

Restricted document access, severely limiting bidder's ability to prepare a bid.
Complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, undermining fairness and clarity.
Lack of integration of green, social, or innovation sustainability aspects.
Potential for subjective evaluation due to missing criteria.
Practical challenges for bidders due to inaccessible tender documents.

Recommendations

1. Immediately ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and objectivity.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
47/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes