Damp, Mould and Condensation Prevention and Remediation Services

This tender for damp, mould, and condensation remediation services exhibits significant quality concerns, primarily due to the complete absence of evaluation criteria and a highly restrictive geographic requirement, which severely impact fairness and clarity.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and no disputes are noted. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the complete absence of evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in compliance with transparency and equal treatment principles.

While the service description and technical requirements are reasonably clear, the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. The contradiction between 'Divided into Parts' and awarding to 'one (1) provider' also introduces ambiguity.

Basic information, estimated value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements. The listed documents appear to be general information rather than comprehensive tender specifications.

The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, preventing objective assessment. Furthermore, the highly restrictive requirement for an operational site within a 25-mile drive from the borough's boundary significantly limits competition and raises strong concerns about potential tailoring or undue preference for local suppliers.

Electronic submission is clearly supported, and key dates and contract duration are well-defined. The absence of an explicit document URL in the provided text (though implied by the e-sourcing portal) and limited detailed financing information beyond the estimated value are minor practical shortcomings.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the 'Characteristics: Divided into Parts' and the stated intention to award to 'one (1) provider.' The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a lack of focus on broader sustainability objectives.