Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the 28-day submission period is reasonable. However, the 'Missing reveal date' and the lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the summary (though referenced in the ITT) represent minor compliance gaps in the provided information.
•Missing reveal date in the provided data structure
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in the summary, requiring reference to full ITT
Clarity60/100
While the service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and comprehensive, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided, and documents are listed. However, the tender is incomplete due to the significant omission of defined evaluation criteria.
•Evaluation criteria are not defined
Fairness65/100
The tender discloses the estimated value, provides reasonable deadlines, and enables e-procurement for equal access. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, hindering fair competition.
•Evaluation criteria are not objective and transparent due to their absence
Practicality85/100
The tender clearly supports electronic submission via the eTenderWales platform, provides a clear contract start date and duration, and includes financing information. This makes the submission process practical for bidders.
Data Consistency70/100
Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field, a missing code for 'Type: Open', and the 'Missing reveal date' flag.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Missing code for 'Type: Open'
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement aspects, social criteria, or an innovation focus. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability principles into the procurement process.
•No explicit green procurement aspects
•No social criteria mentioned