YAS 02 2025_26 C1 Driver Training Framework

This tender provides a clear description of the required C1 Driver Training services but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements, impacting overall quality and fairness.

The procedure type (Open) and CPV code are correctly defined. No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the absence of a reveal date, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements in the provided text are notable omissions that could affect full compliance with procurement regulations.

The description of the service and framework agreement is clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements also contributes to this.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV code are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements. The 'Required: No' status for all listed documents also raises questions about the completeness of the actual tender package.

The estimated value is disclosed, e-procurement is enabled via Atamis, and the eligibility/technical requirements appear generic, promoting broad participation. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermines the transparency and objectivity of the procurement process, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly.

Electronic submission is clearly supported through the Atamis e-procurement system. The contract start date and duration are explicitly stated, which aids planning for potential suppliers. The lack of an explicit document URL is a minor point, as the e-procurement system typically serves this function.

Most key fields are populated, and dates (submission, contract start) are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions include the liable person and specific procedure codes, as well as the reveal date.

The tender description and requirements do not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability considerations into the procurement process.