Legal Compliance75/100
The tender correctly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the summary refers to 'full CfT documents' for mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, which are fundamental legal aspects that should be readily apparent. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a stated value is a minor inconsistency.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in summary
•Missing explicit financial requirements in summary
Clarity65/100
The project description and technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, and the need to consult 'full CfT documents' for mandatory exclusion and financial requirements reduces the immediate clarity of the provided information.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements not explicitly stated in summary
Completeness60/100
Basic information, deadlines, and value are present. However, the tender summary lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria. The listed documents appear to be general information rather than the detailed CfT documents referred to for critical missing information.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing explicit financial requirements
Fairness70/100
The requirements appear generic and not tailored, and e-procurement is enabled. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly impacts fairness, as bidders cannot objectively prepare their proposals or understand the basis of assessment. The reference to 'full CfT documents' for critical details also raises minor concerns about immediate full access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission via etendersNI is supported, and key dates (contract start, duration) are provided. However, the tender is subject to external funding, introducing a degree of uncertainty. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.
•Project subject to external funding (uncertainty)
•No direct document URL provided in summary
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field, empty procedure codes, and the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a stated value.
•'Liable Person' field is empty
•Procedure codes are empty
Sustainability85/100
The tender's core purpose is highly sustainable, focusing on solar PV and battery storage to reduce carbon emissions and support a low-carbon transition. This aligns strongly with green procurement principles. No explicit social or innovation criteria are detailed beyond the project's inherent nature.
•No explicit social criteria
•No explicit innovation focus beyond the project's inherent nature