Provision of Artisan and Special Market - Ormskirk

This tender for market management is generally well-structured with clear requirements and good data consistency, but critically lacks explicit evaluation criteria. The nominal contract value implies a self-sustaining model, which is transparently communicated.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. The submission period from today's date is reasonable. However, the 'reveal date' is missing, and while mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, specific details are not provided in the summary, which could be clearer in the full documentation.

The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria significantly hinders a bidder's ability to understand how their proposal will be assessed, leading to ambiguity in the bidding process.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of defined evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for a comprehensive procurement process.

Document access, e-procurement, and generic requirements contribute positively to fairness. The disclosed nominal value is transparent. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria introduces significant subjectivity and reduces transparency, making it difficult for bidders to compete on an equal and informed basis.

Electronic submission via The Chest portal is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. Financing information, though nominal, is available and explained, contributing to a practical tender process.

The tender exhibits high data consistency with logical dates and populated key fields. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, ensuring reliable information.

The tender mentions 'local supplier support' and 'economic wellbeing' which are positive social/economic aspects. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects beyond local support, or innovation focus, indicating a limited integration of broader sustainability principles.