Tenders

Vilnius Congress Centre open international design competition

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
5544883
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 01, 2025

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
21 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
65
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Administrative purpose Vilnius Congress Centre building with access roads, on A. Goštauto street.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by applicable public procurement law (e.g., bankruptcy, criminal convictions, unpaid taxes).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Atsakymas į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.14DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima 01.14.docx

This document clarifies that foreign specialist qualifications must be recognized in Lithuania by the submission deadline and addresses how professional licenses and project experience are assessed for consortiums, advising to consult relevant Lithuanian authorities for specific document suitability.

Atsakymas į tiekėjų paklausimą 01.20DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.20.docx

This document clarifies that suppliers do not need to submit specialist qualifications at the initial proposal stage for the Vilnius Congress Centre project, as these will be requested from top-ranked participants later.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.21DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.21.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the Vilnius Congress Centre project competition, clarifying details like 3D model availability and confirming the submission deadline, with these answers becoming an integral part of the tender documents.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.23DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.23.docx

This document clarifies a specific qualification requirement for specialists regarding the preparation of technical or technical working projects for special buildings, referencing Lithuanian construction regulations.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.27DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.27.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the Vilnius Congress Centre project competition, clarifying physical model requirements and the scope of the procurement object, and these answers are an integral part of the tender documents, taking precedence over previous provisions.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.30DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.30.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the Vilniaus Congress Centre project, clarifying preliminary building scheme adjustments and servitude requirements, with these clarifications taking precedence over previous tender documents.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 02.05DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_02.05.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding qualification requirements for the Vilnius Congress Centre architectural project competition, clarifying team structure, specialist listing, and EU professional qualification recognition.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 02.12DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_02.12.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the recognition of international (specifically UK) architectural qualifications in Lithuania, clarifying the procedures and requirements for architects to practice in the country for this tender.

Atsakymas 5 klausimąDOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima.docx

This document clarifies that administrative buildings are considered public purpose buildings under STR 2.02.02:2004, confirming the qualification requirement for specialists to have experience with public purpose buildings is correct for the Vilnius Congress Centre project.

2. Responses_to_suppliers_questionsDOC
2. Responses_to_suppliers_questions.docx

This document provides official responses to suppliers' questions, clarifying that experience in public-use buildings is required for specialists, as administrative buildings are classified as public-use under relevant regulations, and these clarifications are an integral part of the procurement documents.

NoticePDF
Notice_5544883.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an open international project competition to design and develop the Vilnius Congress Centre building, including architectural proposals, BIM creation, technical project preparation, and supervision services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and includes extensive clarifications, but it has critical deficiencies regarding evaluation criteria and sustainability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and uses appropriate CPV codes. Mandatory exclusion grounds are specified. The numerous Q&A documents demonstrate an active effort to clarify legal and qualification aspects. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the reveal date is missing.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing reveal date
Clarity60/100

The project description is clear, and the scope is further detailed in the contract notice. The extensive Q&A process has addressed many potential ambiguities. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Basic information (title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, location) is largely present. The availability of 11 detailed documents, including Q&As, significantly enhances the completeness of the information. However, the tender lacks an estimated value and, most importantly, does not specify the evaluation criteria, which are fundamental components of a complete tender package.

Missing estimated value
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100

The tender benefits from full document access and e-procurement, promoting equal access. The clarification that specialist qualifications are not required at the initial proposal stage is a positive step for fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value reduces transparency. The most significant fairness concern is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which undermines objectivity and transparency in the selection process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality70/100

The tender supports e-procurement, which implies electronic submission and streamlines the process. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and financing information (estimated value) is missing, which can make financial planning difficult for potential bidders.

Contract start date not known
Financing information (estimated value) not available
Data Consistency90/100

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates for submission and opening, and consistent duration specifications. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. The main gaps are the missing estimated value, liable person, and reveal date, which are minor inconsistencies rather than contradictions.

Estimated value not disclosed
Liable person not specified
Sustainability20/100

The tender documentation, based on the provided summaries and automated checks, does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. For a significant architectural project like a Congress Centre, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the design and construction.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Extensive Q&A process addressing bidder queries and clarifying requirements
E-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility
Clear procedure type and appropriate CPV codes
No disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable process

Concerns

Critical: Absence of specified evaluation criteria, severely impacting clarity and fairness
Estimated value not disclosed, reducing transparency
Lack of any explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) requirements
Missing contract start date and reveal date

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value or budget for the design services to aid bidder planning.
3. Integrate sustainability requirements (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing, social impact, innovative design solutions) into the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline