Legal Compliance75/100
The document is legally sound as a preliminary market engagement, clearly defining its non-binding status and purpose. It adheres to principles of transparency and uses an appropriate CPV code, indicating good preparatory practice.
•Procedure type not formally defined (expected for PME)
Clarity80/100
The notice is exceptionally clear regarding its status as a market engagement, its objectives, and the information it provides. The explicit statements about the absence of formal tender requirements are unambiguous.
Completeness70/100
While comprehensive for a preliminary market engagement, it naturally lacks the full details of a formal tender, such as specific eligibility, technical, or financial requirements, and detailed evaluation criteria. However, it provides essential future contract information.
•Formal tender requirements and evaluation criteria not yet defined
Fairness85/100
The PME actively promotes fairness by fostering market readiness, encouraging consortia formation through a supplier directory, and utilizing an e-procurement portal for engagement. The value is disclosed, and no tailored requirements are present at this stage.
Practicality65/100
The engagement utilizes an e-procurement portal and provides crucial future contract details (start date, duration, estimated value), aiding market planning. However, the explicit confirmation of e-submission for the formal tender is not yet detailed.
•E-submission for formal tender not explicitly confirmed
Data Consistency90/100
The information provided is highly consistent with the document's status as a preliminary market engagement in the planning phase, with logical dates and appropriately populated fields.
Sustainability50/100
While the Employability Support Programme has an inherent social objective, the PME document does not explicitly detail how broader sustainability (environmental, social criteria beyond the program's core, or innovation) will be integrated into the procurement process or evaluation.
•Lack of explicit sustainability criteria for procurement process
•No explicit innovation focus