Legal Compliance75/100
The notice effectively serves its purpose as a preliminary market engagement, aligning with pre-procurement best practices. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are marked as 'None', which, while acceptable for a planning notice, indicates a lack of formal classification at this stage. The classified value is a minor transparency concern.
•Procedure type not defined (Type: None, Procedure: None)
•Estimated value classified
Clarity85/100
The description of the SENDIAS service, its objectives, target beneficiaries (0-25, parents/carers), and legal framework is exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted technical requirements accurately reflect this clarity, and the market engagement event details are well-communicated.
•Evaluation criteria not yet specified (expected for a planning notice)
Completeness70/100
The notice provides essential information such as title, reference, organization, description, contract duration, and start date. All associated documents are available and summarized. However, as a planning notice, it naturally lacks specific tender submission requirements, detailed eligibility/financial criteria, and evaluation criteria. The estimated value is classified, limiting completeness for potential bidders.
•Estimated value not disclosed/classified
•No specific tender submission/eligibility/financial requirements (expected for planning notice)
Fairness80/100
The proactive market engagement event is a strong indicator of fairness, aiming to inform and gather feedback from a broad range of potential providers. The technical requirements are generic and based on statutory duties, not tailored. However, the classified value reduces transparency, and the automated check indicates 'No e-submission' for the upcoming tender, which could hinder equal access.
•Estimated value classified
•No e-submission indicated for the upcoming tender
Practicality65/100
Key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified, aiding planning for potential bidders. The market engagement event is easily accessible via Microsoft Teams. However, the lack of e-submission for the upcoming tender (as flagged by automated checks) is a significant practical drawback. The classified value also makes it harder for providers to assess the commercial viability of participating.
•No e-submission indicated for the upcoming tender
•Financing information (value) not available
Data Consistency90/100
The information provided is largely consistent across the basic information, description, and AI-extracted requirements. Dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The minor gaps in 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are consistent with its 'planning' status.
•Minor gaps in 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields
Sustainability60/100
While the notice does not explicitly mention green procurement or innovation, the core service itself (SENDIAS) is inherently focused on social welfare, inclusion, and support for vulnerable children, young people, and their families. This strongly aligns with the social pillar of sustainability.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus