Legal Compliance95/100
The document explicitly states it is a Request for Information (RFI) and not a call for competition, which is a legally compliant approach for pre-market engagement. The CPV code is relevant, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The absence of a formal procedure type is appropriate for an RFI.
Clarity95/100
The purpose of seeking market feedback on Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) units is exceptionally clear. Specific habitat types and unit requirements are well-defined, and instructions for PME participation and future procurement registration are unambiguous. The absence of formal evaluation criteria is expected for an RFI.
Completeness90/100
All essential information for a pre-market engagement is provided, including title, organization, reference, estimated value, duration, and location. Requirements for the PME are clearly outlined, and links to the questionnaire and future registration portal are included.
Fairness90/100
The PME approach itself promotes fairness by allowing broad market input before a formal procurement. The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements for BNG units are project-specific but not tailored to a single company. The mention of a future e-procurement system ensures equal access for any subsequent competition.
Practicality90/100
Electronic submission for the PME via an MS Forms link is practical and accessible. Key dates (contract start, duration) and financial information are provided. The links for both the questionnaire and future supplier registration are clearly stated.
Data Consistency95/100
The information provided is highly consistent. The status 'planning' and the explicit 'request for information only' align with the 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' fields. Dates are logical, and there are no reported inconsistencies or disputes.
Sustainability85/100
The core subject of the engagement is 'Biodiversity Net Gain,' which represents a strong and direct focus on environmental sustainability and green procurement. While explicit social aspects or innovation focus are not detailed, the primary environmental objective is very clear and central to the project.
•Lack of explicit social criteria.
•No specific focus on innovation mentioned.